Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Live from the Cutting Edge (Monster & 21 Grams)
Arts and Faith > Art & Media > Film
mike_h
I don't see as many movies as you cineastes and usually even then after they're old news, so I thought I'd better fulfill my duties as a loyal Chicago correspondant and also take advantage of this brief, shining moment on the cutting edge to reveal I've seen both Monster and 21 Grams at the IFP (Independent Feature Project) conference in town this weekend, along with various panel discussions with producers, directors and some independent shorts and features. A great time all around.

Monster will be released in late December, already a major buzz film. Based on a true story, Charlize Theron as a man-hating (with good reason) prostitute gone on homicidal rampage with Christina Ricci as her lover. Big push underway for Oscar consideration for Theron, who gained weight, shaved her eyebrows and looks terrible, but delivers the goods as somebody who has had a terrible life, you don't want to hang out with, but will find sparks of humanity in there somewhere if you stick around. Not necessarily my genre, especially after I heard producer Mark Damon in a panel discussion talk about how easy a film with two hot women in bed together would be to distribute. There's more to it than that, as first-time director Patty Atkins (the film is an amazing accomplishment for a first-time director), who was also present, talked about how she and Theron (a producer on the film) conspired to avoid the cliches and sleaziest expecations to tell a difficult story about a difficult individual, with the right balance of pity and disgust. Wasn't sure it was redemptive enough for me, but my immediate reaction was immediately tempered by Atkins passionate and articulate sharing of her vision. The Theron performance is certainly intense, violently against-type, but occasionally over-the-top -- though no doubt the character (ultimately executed under Jeb Bush's regime) was bizarrely larger-than-life. Theron's best moments are when she is agonizing over what she has done/become and yet cannot pull herself out of the downward trajectory. Not a feel-good film, but, again, powerful material and performances and stunning debut for the director.

21 Grams I think I might have actually liked better, probably better than jRobert. Directed by Alejandro González Iñárritu whose last film Amores Perros I loved, this film doesn't quite live up to the Lost Dog story in that film (what could?) but there's alot to like, even though the chopped-up non-linear editing may cause you to wonder if anything is behind the frenetic style. Some moments are, ironically, slow and don't work at all for me: Benicio Del Toro's new ex-druggie religious convert at times falls into the worst Jesus Psycho cliches, which is always a fast turn-off for me. But when he gets away from that stuff he's good, but Sean Penn and especially Naomi Watts are even better. She has some searing emotional moments that made the hair on my neck stand on end as a woman whose personal tragedy becomes entangled with two strangers and their own individual tragedies. The "21 Grams" idea (referencing an urban myth about how much weight the body loses upon death) really doesn't play out as literally as I feared going in, but as a sort of narrative coda on what has transpired, a metaphor for the value of human life. As big a splash as Monster is bound to make, and as imperfect as this one is, seeing them back to back (man, what an intense afternoon) I left thinking this one the more vital and engaging. (But, then again, maybe that's only cause it played second in order).

Hope that makes up somewhat for not keeping up with most every other major release lately. (I did see a great old movie on video this weekend, Force of Evil -- a Martin Scorsese presentation of a classic 1948 film noir I'd never heard of: wow. Go find this one)
MLeary
Man, I knew I should have paid my IFP dues this year. That alone would have made it worth it. Are you going to post full length reviews in the future?
Overstreet
Yeccch. I've been trying to avoid writing my long review of 21 Grams, but I guess I should get around to it. Here's what I blurbed over in my viewing journal:

Get out the violins. Misery upon misery rains down on the heads of Benicio Del Toro, Naomi Watts, and Sean Penn, until even their furrows of their brows have furrows. Eventually the weight of the angst crushed the script, and it all just turned silly. Beware of a totally pornographic sex scene in the middle with Penn and Watts... unnecessary, indulgent, and really irritating. Will it win Oscars? Probably.

I would also add: Here's what it seems to be saying. If there is a God, he's gonna hang you out to dry, especially if you try to serve him. Christians? Idealistic and deluded. So, regardless of the God question, you're on your own, so dig in your heels and pursue what you desire, and damn the consequences. You gotta be your own savior and make your own good in the world, cause bad things happen to everybody and really really bad things happen if you try to do anything good.
mike_h
Well, so much for the cutting edge. Yeah, the sex and anti-god pretensions were way too much, and usually such things quickly upstage and overshadow the other aspects of any film for me. But somehow I got caught up in the central question -- of how much we lose when we lose those 21 grams -- powered by a couple moments of Naomi Watts -- when she gets some bad news, and when she hears something unexpected from Sean Penn: devastating moments that blew back the film's admitted flaws long enough for me to connect and reflect on that question. "Yow" or "Yike" maybe, but I still don't think entirely "Yeccch."
Overstreet
Well, I *will* give the actors credit... at least Del Toro and Watts... for giving their all in what are probably their finest performances. Penn, however, while definitely immersed in his character, becomes increasingly distracting to me because of his seeming-obsession with playing angst-burdened, desperate, self-absorbed characters.
MLeary
I have been a fan of Penn ever since the glorious prison thriller Bad Boys. But I have to admit that I almost became tired of him in Mystic River.

Even though I hate his politics and the like, seeing him in lengthy interviews with Charlie Rose or on Inside the Actor's Studio is always exciting. The guy has a profound grasp of what he is doing in film and what film is doing to us. He really seems to be working out of a very reasoned, intelligent understanding of the filmed image. (In his Inside the Actor's Studio interview he finished saying something like: "I am interested in films that are able to create poetry without creating worlds that we cannot touch." That really is a great statement.)

But as you say JO, he has become so typecast. He is always riffing on that angst. So much so that I don't think we will ever see Penn really unfold until he is directed by Werner Herzog. Herzog has such a gift for harnessing angst and anger and intensity and letting it drive the images of his films. So I think Penn has his ups and downs, but it would be nice to see him used by someone who knows what to do with him. I seriously thought Eastwood's film was going to be "the" film for Penn but it didn't seem to work out.
Peter T Chattaway
Jeffrey Overstreet wrote:
: I've been trying to avoid writing my long review of 21 Grams, but I
: guess I should get around to it.

Or you could link to the thread that, ahem, already exists for that film.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.