So I was chatting with a publicist prior to a P.A. tour event the other day, and she mentioned that recent news about the looming demise of print criticism has got studios in quite a flurry over courting Internet press. So it appears that the studios are simply waking up to the inevitable.
So who on the Web is going to become the next generation of Siegels, Corlisses, Eberts, and so on? And will critics working in the Christian community be a part of that? What strategies need to be developed to break down the divide between mainstream and Christian press? Or should that barrier be broken down?
Though I technically meet the membership requirements of the Online Film Critics' Society, my application was turned down last year because my reviews are apparently "long on plot summary" and short on criticism. Fair enough; I write opening-day reviews, not 3000-word essays for Film Comment. But I suspect there was more to it than that; I think the content of my reviews stacks up pretty well with the vast bulk of the reviews listed at Rotten Tomatoes... which is the whole point of membership in the OFCS.
Do we need a Christian equivalent to the OFCS, something bigger and more influential than the FFCC?
Or do we need something entirely new, like an "Internet Film Reviewer's Society" that focuses more on the kind of criticism that most of us practice, and people actually read?
