Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Synecdoche, New York
Arts and Faith > Art & Media > Film
opus
The trailer for Synecdoche, New York has just popped up in the Intertubes -- click here.

And yeah, it looks like another Kaufman flick: brilliant, absurd, and rather mind-bending. Here's a brief synopsis:

QUOTE
Theater director Caden Cotard is mounting a new play. Fresh off of a successful theatrical run in his hometown of Schenectady, New York, Caden decides to trade in the suburban spectators and local theater for the cultured audiences and bright footlights of Broadway. Awarded a "Genius" grant and determined to create a piece of brutal realism and honesty, something into which he can put his whole self, he gathers an ensemble cast into a warehouse in Manhattan's theater district. He directs them in a celebration of the mundane, instructing each to live out their constructed lives in a small mockup of the city outside.

As the city inside the warehouse grows, Caden's own life veers wildly off the tracks. The shadow of his ex-wife Adele, a celebrated painter who left him years ago for Germany’s art scene, sneers at him from every corner. Somewhere in Berlin, his daughter Olive is growing up under the questionable guidance of Adele's friend, Maria. Caden is helplessly driving his marriage to actress Claire into the ground while neglecting his second daughter. Sammy Barnathan, the actor Caden hires to play himself within the play, is a bit too perfect for the part, and makes it difficult for Caden to revive his relationship with the alluringly candid box office girl, Hazel. Meanwhile, his therapist, Madeline Gravis, is better at plugging her best-seller than counseling him. And a mysterious condition begins systematically shutting down each of his autonomic functions, one by one.
Jason Panella
I was just about the post a thread. I saw the trailer last night and it has really stuck with me. I'm excited to see this. Kaufman is such an interesting writer; I'm not the biggest fan of some of the films he's been involved with (Being John Malkovich, for instance), but the guy is incredibly talented, and I'm always intrigued by what he does.

This looks like it could be incredible.
techne
wow.

yikes!

wow.
Jason Panella
QUOTE (techne @ Sep 19 2008, 07:55 PM) *
wow.

yikes!

wow.


In reference to my comment, to the trailer, or to both? smile.gif
MLeary
Nice piece on this here.

QUOTE
“I take my work very seriously, and there is this stupid system in place that suggests that the director is the auteur and that the writer is just this secondary along for the ride,” he said. “It’s less about trying to be successful than just saying that I am a smart guy, I have a good idea, and I know this script better than anyone, so I am going to take on this movie. It could have been a failure, but that wasn’t really what I was thinking about.”
Overstreet
Seeing this Thursday, interviewing Kaufman on Friday.


Any questions for him?


techne
i wonder if any of the critics are addressing the title i.e. the idea of synedoche - in which a part represents the whole - and using that as a door into interpreting the work?
Christian
I still haven't seen it, but Chris Orr has, and although he's still digesting it, he has very nice things to say.
Darrel Manson
I had a good time with this. It is certainly something of a mind game (as are all Kaufman's scripts), and an interesting one. I know Qoheleth is grinning as (s)he watches. I really love the way Hazel's character is cast.

Although Kaufman's answer to Jeffrey's question is that he doesn't deal with matters of faith, I think there could be some lumberjacks in the background here. Well, maybe not faith, exactly, but some sense of the Creator and the Creator's continuing role in creation. How the Creator does or does not control the creation.
Josh Hurst
I left my screening yesterday morning feeling exhausted and frustrated by this film, though I was certainly not bored or even displeased with it. I told the publicist it was one of the strangest movies I'd ever seen. Then I went home and couldn't stop thinking about it. It kept me up half the night. And this morning, I realized that I think I love it-- and want to see it again.

I just got an e-mail from the friend I took to the screening, who described the exact same trajectory to me.

In other words: I think this is a very special movie.
Peter T Chattaway
I definitely don't "love" this movie, but I feel I should see it again before saying anything about it. It was only after my second viewing of Adaptation, after all, that I "got" that movie and really came to love it.

That said, Synecdoche, New York just seems to wallow in misery, misery, misery, and I'm not sure that I really "get" anything interesting or exciting out of the experience, the way that I do with Adaptation or Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind.

Oh, and note, once again, Kaufman's "baby" fetish. Remember how, in both Adaptation and Eternal Sunshine, there were scenes where women said something along the lines that they wished they could be babies again, because then they would be "new"? Something quasi-similar happens in Synecdoche, when a woman attends a funeral and hears herself described as the person's daughter, and the woman says, "I was a baby," as though this thought is a surprising one and has never crossed her mind before.
stef
I haven't been looking forward to any movie this much in years.

Okay, maybe Batman Begins.

But no film, as opposed to summer movie.
Crow
I have to admit, this was a film I admired more than I liked. Mostly this had to do with the main character, who I just didn't find interesting or particularly likeable enough to get emotionally involved with the journey he takes.

But I have to give Charlie Kaufman credit for creating such an intricate storyline and his own intellectual universe in which to structure what he's doing here. I'll be willing to give this film a second viewing because I admired Kaufman's earlier work so much, and I'll probably get more on board with what Kaufman was trying to accomplish.

I did think that the last line Phillip Seymour Hoffman's character spoke in the film was quite poignant.
DanBuck
From my reflections about the film. MILD SPOILERS here and on my blog.
QUOTE
The film is truly about our conscious effort to live life. It explores the fact that any attention given to our own existence somehow makes it less authentic. In trying to be true to ourselves, we become someone other than ourselves trying too hard to be whoever we think we are.

There’s a particularly funny and razor sharp moment where an actor walks by Caden on the immense set of the “play”. The actor is not, as far as we know, on stage in that moment, and yet, Caden stops him with the director’s note “No one would ever walk like that.” The actor apologizes, goes back a few paces and tries again, looking far less authentic and far more self-conscious than he was the first time. “No,” Caden remarks, “Keep working on it.” Before we cut to another scene we see the actor cross once more, this time more ridiculously than either of the previous attempts. The film is a metaphysical/anthropological refutation of statements like “act natural” and “just be yourself.”


For the rest of my thoughts - go here.
Peter T Chattaway
FWIW, Noah Millman says he "noticed a distinct similarity between Charlie Kaufman’s movie and Kazuo Ishiguro’s masterwork, The Unconsoled, one of my all-time favorite books". He has not yet teased out what he means by that, though.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.