Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Film Calls Gays to 'Come Out' -- of Lifestyle
Arts and Faith > Art & Media > Film
Christian
The subject of homosexuality has come up in these forums numerous times, within the context of theological and political discussions, but I don't know how often we've discussed the possibility of transition out of the gay lifestyle.

A new film opens the door to such discussions, if anyone's interested.

I've always found this controversy fascinating, although at times I've been overwhelmingly depressed at the polarized dialogue about this issue. The gay lobby and religious right both have so much to lose by ceding any ground in their respective arguments that the stories of the individuals who have gone through this process often get obscured. Some go through it and fail; this film highlights some of the success stories. What the future holds for these folks, only God knows.
theoddone33
Well I think I missed all the previous discussions, so I'll say my piece here.

In college a speaker I once heard was a man who currently runs a Christian ministry to homosexuals. Currently I can't remember the name of the man or the ministry, but I wish I could. As a young man he had feelings of attraction for other men and dabbled in homosexuality, but decided that as a Christian he could not act on them and would be celebate from that point on, even if it meant for the rest of his life. When he, some twenty years later, ended up in a romantic relationship with a woman, it caught him completely by surprise. In his own words,"I was astonished."

Some of the stuff I've read about "ex-gay" therapy groups, even in the last 30 minutes, is quite simply ridiculous, and I think they miss the point. Sexual preference is a complex psychological issue, not just a switch that can be turned on or off. Some people struggle with it for their whole lives, and this isn't something that just goes away when some group leader starts teaching you to act more masculine or feminine.

Really, the ideal process has two steps, and two steps alone. Conviction of sin, and cessation of sin. It's God's job to convict a person of sin, not the Christian's. Similarly, it's the individual's responsibility to cease sinning. The process ends up being like the one the man I mentioned went through. Adoption of heterosexuality shouldn't be the goal for these ministries... cessation of homosexual behavior should. If a heterosexual attraction develops later in life, that is great, but it's not something that can or should be forced. If I care about a man who is caught up in homosexuality, I'm not going to try to hook him up with a woman... I'm going to be there for him when he talks about temptation, and offer prayer and support.
Peter T Chattaway
theoddone33, we have threads that deal with the theological and political aspects of this subject already -- I think this thread should be reserved, as much as possible, for discussion of the FILM.

And with that, I'll just mention, in response to Christian's post, that I agree with both Campolos when they say that we should try to avoid jargon like "the gay lifestyle". There is more than one gay lifestyle, just as there is more than one het lifestyle.
Denny Wayman
I was going to add this to another thread but it is closed, so I will add it here.

I received my undergrad degree in psychology in 1973 and started seminary that year. It was in that same year, 1973, that the APA changed the DSMII and removed homosexuality as a disorder. Trained before this change, it was clear that up until 1973 a great deal of clinical experience had been collected to understand both the way persons became homosexual and interventions to help those who chose to address this sexual distortion and seek to change.

In a classic article summarizedhere, Dr. Irving Beiber was a part of that historic debate and represented what became the losing side of the argument. But it is clear that the decision was not based only on science or even clinical experience, but a shift in the society and the field of psychology itself based on activist pressure.

The summary of the summary of the article says:

QUOTE
The factors that determined the decision of the APA to delete homosexuality from DSM-II were summarized as follows:
1. Gay activists had a profound influence on psychiatric thinking.
2. A sincere belief was held by liberal-minded and compassionate psychiatrists that listing homosexuality as a psychiatric disorder supported and reinforced prejudice against homosexuals. Removal of the term from the diagnostic manual was viewed as a humane, progressive act.
3. There was an acceptance of new criteria to define psychiatric conditions. Only those disorders that caused a patient to suffer or that resulted in adjustment problems were thought to be appropriate for inclusion in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual.


As a pastoral counselor who has worked with several seeking change over these decades, my experience would be similar to the statistics that were common before the 1973 change, that is about 1 in 4 (27%) are able to make a significant shift. I would not describe these persons as “cured” but rather having made a significant, sustained change. Like all counseling, and especially when working with true disorders, there are few who become “cured” but rather make significant change.

Denny
run
Could you describe the before and after scenerio of one of your significantly sustained changed individuals?

What do you mean by significantly changed?

How do you measure or observe change?
mrmando
Quoting ThePersistanceofWaffles, from the other thread:

QUOTE
Well, if I thought the purpose of this documentary was to say "Here's an interesting story about these five particular people"- then I might agree with you. But I have the feeling they *are* trying to say that Exodus, et al, can help everyone. It seems to me, especially after reading the article Jeffrey linked to, that the implications of the film are "gays can change, heterosexuality is an option for everyone, gay is a choice"- and we should adjust our social, political, and religious views accordingly.

That does indeed seem to be what the article suggests. Whether that's actually the message of the film, or whether the article is just trying to spin the film to make its own points, I couldn't say until I had seen the film. I am suspicious of any article that quotes Ted Baehr.

QUOTE
I also disagree that the best way to phrase the issue is "some can change, some can't"- that suggests a kind of parity that doesn't really exist.

I never said it was the best way, nor did I intend to imply parity. I had no numbers in front of me, so thanks for supplying the ones you did.

QUOTE
In other words, "a small few can change their sexuality, the vast majority can not" is a more accurate way to put it.

Fair enough.

QUOTE
And yet, so many of us within Christianity only hear "gays... changed."

I'm willing to bet most people reading this will have a more nuanced view of the subject.

QUOTE
We continue to let bad science and purely anecdotal evidence (which is, I'll bet, all that is offered in this documentary) determine our entire outlook towards gay people.
I try not to have an entire outlook towards gay people, just as, indeed, I try not to have an entire outlook toward African-Americans, Muslims, Catholics, movie critics, or any class of people considered as a group. I have to go with what I know. So, speaking of anecdotal evidence, I have a good friend A at church who's a former lesbian. I also have a good friend B from college who is now a pastor of a gay church in Colorado. One camp wants me to think A is kidding herself and the other wants me to think B is deluded. I want to think God's grace is sufficient for both of my friends.
Christian
QUOTE(mrmando @ Jul 16 2005, 02:20 AM)
One camp wants me to think A is kidding herself and the other wants me to think B is deluded. I want to think God's grace is sufficient for both of my friends.


Sufficient for what?
Peter T Chattaway
Link to the other, now-closed thread.
Denny Wayman
Run,

Here is one set of criteria that is about as good as I've seen.


QUOTE
being

1. "in a sustained, loving heterosexual relationship within the past year."
2. "getting enough satisfaction from the emotional relationship with their partner to rate at least seven on a 10-point scale."
3. "having satisfying heterosexual sex at least monthly," and 
4. "never or rarely thinking of somebody of the same sex during heterosexual sex."



One of the problems we have with all of the disorders is that no one can really say anyone is "cured." For example, with bipolar disorder,


QUOTE
Although there's no cure for bipolar disorder, treatment can help stabilize a person's moods and help the person manage and control symptoms.



This is in fact what is true in much of life, not only in psychological disorders or sexual issues or temptations (including the desire for adultery or envy) is that we are empowered by God and encouraged by therapy to make behavior choices which enhance our lives and honor our Creator, our family, our community and ourselves.

Denny
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.