Jump to content

NBooth

Member
  • Content Count

    4,904
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About NBooth

  • Rank
    Collector of Oddities

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.nathanaeltbooth.com/

Profile Information

  • Interests
    Literature. Film. Music. The theater. Philosophy. Theology.

Previous Fields

  • Occupation
    Lecturer in American Literature, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
  • Favorite movies
    Top Ten (descending order):The Third Man (Reed, 1949) Mulholland Drive (Lynch, 2001) 2046 (Wong, 2004) Vertigo (Hitchcock, 1958) Zodiac (Fincher, 2007) Citizen Kane (Welles, 1941) There Will Be Blood (Anderson, 2007) Raiders of the Lost Ark (Spielberg, 1981) Once Upon a Time in the West (Leone, 1968) The Thin Man (Van Dyke, 1934)
  • Favorite music
    Top Ten (descending order):Bob Dylan,David Bowie,Nick Cave,Brandi Carlile,Josh Ritter,Bill Mallonee,Robert Johnson,Willie Nelson,Van Morrison,The Beatles,
  • Favorite creative writing
    Top Ten (descending order): Tristram Shandy,    The Idiot,    Absalom Absalom!,    Winesburg, Ohio,    Leaves of Grass,    The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes,    Calamity Town,    Our Man in Havana,    Kings Row,    A Sentimental Journey

Recent Profile Visitors

10,628 profile views
  1. I’m rather proud of this piece I wrote for Rise Up Daily.
  2. NBooth

    The Lighthouse

    This was actually a movie (like 2018's The Favourite) that I was pretty sure I would love based on the look and various things I had read about it. Well, I finally got to it and--yep, I really love this movie. I'm less captivated by the horror aspects than by the relationship between the two characters and the Promethean stuff--there's something to be said (I'm not quite sure what, yet) about the way the ideas of lighthouses, keepers of flames, etc, plays into the not-erotic-but-erotically-charged May-December relationship between Dafoe and Pattinson (the characters' respective names would play into this as well...). I need to collect my thoughts first, though.
  3. My list. Usual caveats about time read. Yes, I count audiobooks. Nonfiction bold. January Buccola, Nicholas. The Fire is upon Us: James Baldwin, William F. Buckley, Jr., and the Debate over Race in America. Vidal, Gore. Julian.
  4. I finally got around to this show in 2019 and am, perhaps, a little obsessed with it. I'm not sure it's good, most of the time (it's had some really good episodes), but it sucked me in enough that I picked up the books and read the first one. I liked it, too, though I've had trouble getting into the sequel (the first chapter of which has what strikes me as some genuinely bad writing). Brightbills definitely doesn't feel like graduate school, though--at least, not one with which I'm familiar. Not enough angsting over publications and the disappearing job market.
  5. I would say Username, Avatar, Interests, Post-count, and role should be fine, although limiting it to Username, Avatar, and Post-Count might be ideal.
  6. Any Kindle-users out there should note that GV's books are regularly discounted, at least in the US store. Right now, Julian is 5.99. I picked it up a while back and have been struggling to find the time to read it. Now that the semester is over, I'm finally able to concentrate. It's really good, I think, and intersects with Myra Breckinridge in unexpected (to me) ways.
  7. Here's an old video that just crawled across my YouTube recommendations.
  8. Incidentally, it's occurred to me that--if Star Trek 09 can be thought of as Abrams' audition for Star Wars, then this movie is arguably an audition for Indiana Jones. It steals a whole plot-hole, more or less, from Raiders and it borrows a notably iconic bit from Last Crusade. And Poe has a particularly Indiana Jones-ish look to him. EDIT: Ken, you posted just when I did, so I didn't see your inquiry. I'll try to develop some thoughts, but for now my take is that I-VI represent the idiosyncratic vision of a single man with a number of identifiable obsessions (Campbell, yes, but also Freud--the whole Prequel Trilogy is steeped in pop-Freudianism), while the Disney movies aren't. Of the Disney movies, one is the work of a filmmaker who knows how to create interesting visuals and push characters in unexpected directions, while the other two are directed by a man who relentlessly shoots even the biggest vistas like they're small rooms. But, like, I'm at the point where I consider the Lucas Star Wars to be one thing and the Disney Star Wars to be another, separate, wholly ignorable thing. I'm glad The Last Jedi exists, but I don't care about anything else Disney does with the property for the foreseeable future (though I might check out the Obi-Wan miniseries).
  9. Apparently, Abrams is saying that Finn wanted to tell Rey that he was Force-sensitive. You can kinda see that, if you go into the movie knowing it, but it doesn't really have a payoff.
  10. Kind of funny that Abrams has revived two SF franchises now and in both cases the end result was that the best installments were directed by someone else. This movie is terrible. What a sorry “end” to the Saga. (It’s not the end. Nothing ever ends, to quote another property that got a much better sequel this year. They’ll be back to the well within a decade, is my guess).
  11. We don't have a thread on HBO's Watchmen?! It's good. Far better than it has any right to be. Since it's just wrapped its first (only?) season, perhaps discussion here isn't on the cards. It's a shame, because there's a lot going on here; instead of a carbon-copy of the comic, Lindelof and his crew have created an inquiry into areas the original version tended to avoid--race, especially--and manage to do so in a way that isn't ham-fisted (well, except for the fact that racists are particularly ham-fisted lately, so that realism looks like satire). [I've not seen the finale yet, so perhaps this praise is premature]. Anyway, I wanted to share this interview because at a certain point it keys into a number of intersecting interests present on this board. It's at Queerty, which is a pretty worthless rag of a website--except that they've managed to score Lindelof for an interview and, well
  12. Apparently this show is going to rest on the exact intersection of clever and stupid, considering the way in which its twist might have already been figured out by...reading the promotional material.
  13. My list is pretty basic, but I gotta do me. John Carter just barely didn’t make the cut. EDIT: Looking over Evan's list and I can't believe I left out The Assassin. Definitely top 20.
×
×
  • Create New...