Jump to content

Doug C

Member
  • Content Count

    1,608
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Doug C

  • Rank
    Member

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Los Angeles
  • Interests
    film history, film criticism, science fiction, euro board games, hiking, travel

Previous Fields

  • Occupation
    Instructor, PhD student, critic, programmer, father
  • Favorite movies
    Ordet, Au hasard Balthazar, Stalker, Europa '51, Sansho the Bailiff, Make Way for Tomorrow, Late Spring, Red Beard, Sunrise, Blade Runner, Le Rayon Vert, The Decalogue, The Mortal Storm, 2001: A Space Odyssey, The Night of the Hunter, Chimes at Midnight, The Wrong Man, The Man Who Planted Trees

Recent Profile Visitors

2,663 profile views
  1. Yeah, Russ, I too saw that it is already streaming, which might have shocked me if I hadn't already witnessed its theatrical marginalization. I suppose we should start a new Nancy Drew thread, but I'm not sure the film warrants one; I don't have a ton to say about it except that it was a good matinee for me and my 11-year-old. And watching a movie about a spunky teen solving mysteries and learning life lessons was a notable breath of fresh air after all the overinflated, "mythic" superhero drudgery on the big and small screen these days. Maybe we should just retitle this thread Good New Movies for Parents of Tweens and leave it at that. Given the title, we shouldn't have to update it more than a couple times a year.
  2. Doug C

    DVD Bazaar

    I might have some old Criterions I've upgraded to Blu-ray if I dig around, although I tend to trade in my old DVDs for store credit. I'll keep an eye out.
  3. Attack the Block sounds awesome, I will track it down. My daughter discovered the mystery genre last year, and while the Nancy Drew books (ghost-written in the 1930s) have not aged well, there is a series of first-person video games she has really enjoyed, so I was eager to take her to the new movie. Needless to say, your sarcasm about the film's distribution is completely deserved. I was shocked to see that it was showing only in three theaters in my general vicinity, which is like 3% of the available screens. No surprise that we were the only people in the theater, although I think a handful came in at some point. It's a modest, fun movie, with a plum role for an elderly actress I couldn't identify, although she reminded me of Olivia Dukakis. Afterward, my wife told me it was Linda Lavin, the star of the TV show "Alice," which I probably haven't thought about since I was 12. She's great. We had a good time.
  4. Hi Beth! Yes, although I'm not that familiar with the original texts, I appreciated how the kid's story paralleled the literary Arthur's—without constantly underscoring it. (He thought they succeeded but failed to contemplate his own soul, etc.) I think a young person who might like the film would be amenable to the original's themes because the film retained them in many ways.
  5. Well, I've read the essay, which I think is pretty good. I don't know if Jones has any training in phenomenology, but I do think his statement is justified--Riquet acknowledges and tries to befriend Rosetta, and although she fights it, she eventually relents and in return, acknowledges him and "allows him to exist." In her incantation, she says "I have a friend," but does she really at that point? The waffles and dancing scene is a masterpiece of counterpoint, Rosetta resisting intimacy every step of the way. And later, she reports on him to get his job--until she finally understands a job is not what she needs to truly exist (though her solution is to cease existence). Rosetta is not a bad person, her care for her mother reveals that, but a deeply afraid one whose hard shell of self-reliance is a protective survival mechanism. It treats everyone in utilitarian fashion, a means to an end, which she thinks is necessary for her survival. Her revelation is that this persistent young man really wants to be her friend and that she needs him.
  6. I'll have to hunt down Jones's essay, but my initial thought is that the intentionality of Subject and Object is reversible, thus Riquet sees Rosetta, and in return she sees him. He's really the only character (or the first at least) who she allows within her self-protective shell. Of course this is part of a process that is first seen when she tries to let him drown but can't, which Riquet even points out later. Riquet's cries compel her to respond even though she doesn't want to, and for reasons she hasn't fully processed.
  7. Yes, Ken, as phenomenology is a method that describes the initial moment of impact, and brackets off interpretation until one has adequately described the phenomena (in the case of film, visual and aural, although other senses might be perceived), and looked for variant/invariant qualities through intersubjective comparison (or in the Dardennes' case, multiple subjectivities of viewer-camera-and characters watching other characters), it is pre-reflective and pre- or proto-ideological (political, theological, what have you). One can still get to those thematizations but it takes longer; you really have to stop and focus on what you're actually seeing and hearing first, the perceived sense of being-in-the-world, both what is revealed and what is hidden. So in that sense, the idea that we are formed by our response to what we perceive—and particularly, in Levinas and the Dardennes, through the face of the other—is both pre-reflective and post-reflective. The kid with a bike grabs Samantha because she is there, and only later does he and she (along with the viewer) come to recognize meaning(s) in the action, etc.
  8. I've actually been focused on other things in my graduate studies the past few years, which made it particularly nice to revisit the Dardennes, and that article, which was really a summary statement of my several years of engagement with the whole neorealist-transcendent Rossellini-Bresson-Dardenne continuum. Definitely recommend Address of the Eye, which is The Book on film phenomenology, which continues to spark my fascination with film (and life in general). Thank you for your summary, Ken, it makes me happy to know some of my main ideas successfully came across!
  9. I can now add the new Nancy Drew movie to "fun, smart, empowering films for tweens." I find these kind of movies so rare in today's Hollywood, most of which—as you know—is superheroes, franchises, or their sequels, and all of which are overblown, self-consciously mythic (in the worst Heroes Journey-as-rote-template), and take themselves more seriously than that most stolid Biblical adaptation. Hollywood seems to have forgotten how to make clever, unpretentious entertainment, but it's movies like this that renew my hope.
  10. Hey Russ! I admit to knowing nothing about any of the filmmakers. Do clue me in on Cornish...
  11. Harry is often compared to a (were)wolf in sheep's clothing—think of him extending his hand to the moon before he kills Willa or yelping and running to the barn after being shot by Rachel—and I think that is the dualism involved. Not so much someone struggling between right and wrong, but someone who is quintessentially malevolent but constantly trying to appear good.
  12. Sorry, Joel, I don't really have notes, or at least readable ones. I was drawing from a lot of different sources and just giving them an intro (I only had 20 minutes).
  13. Hey Christian! Yes, I had mild expectations, and it's not like The Greatest Film Ever, but it was really nice to finally have a film that I could take my daughter to that was fun, empowering, emotionally honest, and didn't insult her intelligence. We had a good time.
  14. Just wanted to say that I thoroughly enjoyed Ken and my presentations last night at Campbell University. I hope this is a series Ken continues with other speakers. He presented on Dreyer, and I presented on the Dardennes. We had about 80 students, and they seemed very engaged and asked questions afterward. Given that I met Ken here at A&F many moons ago, I thought I would mention it here.
  15. I visited A&F to see if there was any commentary on this film, and I was surprised there wasn't. You probably need to have been a 10-year-old and currently have a 10-year-old to fully appreciate this very charming throwback (and in many ways improvement upon) '80s coming-of-age fantasy films, complete down to its retro synth score. I'll take one of these over 10 of Hollywood's latest superhero movies any day.
×
×
  • Create New...