Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by JoelBuursma

  1. Interesting. Well, apparently there is reason to hope. Now Chinese officials appear to be dismissing the accusation of a ban! I guess the proof will be in the pudding.
  2. According to this news site: The article mentions a number of well-known Western groups that had to cancel or alter performances. This will also affect this non-profit Christian arts group, which has sponsored such performances in the past.
  3. I'm guessing (a Rez fan could perhaps confirm) that he or someone close to him struggled with addiction & doesn't realize that some people don't -- the whole Romans 14 thing. If Jesus were in a restaurant with an alcoholic, I'm guessing he would not imbibe.
  4. What I got from listening to Jethro Tull in high school is that the singer was deeply bitter about his religious upbringing and the authority figures of his youth and deeply skeptical of religion. It makes you wonder what happened to him to cause this (ideas occur to me, but I would hesitate to mention them). But I'm glad someone found something in his words that moved them closer to God (eventually)!
  5. Does "A Living Prayer" by Alison Krauss count? It's an explicitly Christian song on an album that is not otherwise explicitly Christian (and is, in fact, depressing in many places). "The Golden Road" by The Resurrection Band (second album, I think) is one of my all-time favorites. I'm surprised to hear that Thin Lizzy has Christian songs, but not surprised that they flow from struggles with addiction. I always felt that his picture of human existence was a troubled one.
  6. "Imposing"? That sounds so top down. In reality, we are dealing with missionaries who are trying to spread Christianity and attract followers. I don't see how the word "imposing" relates to this. I don't think Endo uses that language. I think he uses a metaphor of transplanting a beautiful tree into a swamp -- will it grow there? By contrast, Scorsese's language seems much more ham-fisted to me. That raises my concern level for this movie. BTW, Scorsese's comment reminded me of Kingsolver's Poisonwood Bible book. However, Endo's book goes far beyond that into questions of the nature of aposta
  7. I saw your recent post on Tavener at Jeffrey's blog, Alan, & I came over here & am glad I found this discussion. Thanks much for the links! Earlier in this thread you mention The Veil of the Temple. I recently listened to that & it raised red flags for me. There were a number of things I would (admittedly ungraciously) refer to as "Gnostic garbage" in the words & the commentary. It got me wondering somewhat incredulously... has this guy been reading The Da Vinci Code??? (Using the climactic section of a major work to... criticize the Knights Templar? Who's next on Tavene
  8. Right -- I was just wondering why they chose Idaho. It seems like a random choice, and I was just constructing this possible train of thought where they may have set it in Utah and then decided to *actually* set it in Idaho because they were Mormons and Utah has Mormon connotations and people might think this was a Mormon movie (see first post in this thread about not calling it "Mormon cinema"), so maybe they changed it to Idaho to avoid the connotations. But, after thinking about it more... this is a "random" movie -- why *not* set it in a random state? I guess the train of thought was m
  9. This is set in Idaho, which is kind of like Utah, but doesn't have any Mormon connotations. Hmmm... anything to this? I noticed that some people felt it was cruel to laugh at Napoleon & others didn't & said they identified with them. Maybe your reaction depends how much you identified with Napoleon. Which of these characters were YOU in high school?
  10. Here is a Larry King live transcript that mostly focuses on Brokeback Mountain & gay marriage & all the usual stuff. But, one of the four contributors is Chad Allen. There is a lot of interesting (although off-topic) discussion, but at the end there is this: Allen either didn't catch or gracefully ignored what Parshall probably meant as a dig with her "find your own path to God" comment. But I thought this was interesting.
  11. Here is the Chicago Tribune's acerbic review. I'm sure the reviewer has some valid points about the movie, and I can understand trying to be entertaining in the way one writes a review. But the repeated anti-Christian digs in a movie review just seem weird. My wife wondered why she didn't just stick to reviewing the movie. Wow, how big of her to say so! What's with the quotes around "true story"? I can't decide if she's trying to be funny here or not. I assume so, based on other reviews of hers that I've read, but it's really not a funny topic. And part of me hopes that she proteste
  12. Saw this on DVD and thought it was WONDERFUL. The kid is awesome. We have all been given a great gift here. I also wish there had been another way they could have communicated message of sharing and people working together without reinterpreting one of Jesus' miracles. But some people feel the need to liberate Christianity from things like "contingency upon an actual existance of a theistic God" (some of the same people who think that the social gospel is the only gospel). I think it's just the filmmaker's viewpoint, consistent with other themes of the movie. It's just that things like that w
  13. Just saw it for the first time on DVD. Hmm... it hasn't been out that long & Blockbuster has already shifted it to week-long rentals. I thought: - The dolphin song was one of the best parts. My two-year old daughter loved the sing-along DVD special feature. - They didn't explain well enough the planet where you got swatted for having an idea -- it's a very funny concept, but I didn't fully get it until I watched the "making of" DVD special feature. Or was it just me? - Somehow the movie seemed preachier (from an atheist propaganda standpoint) than the books. (Poor Trillian--she thou
  14. ← Yes, but the priest was a "cool" priest, so maybe he wasn't all about little details. And my but didn't he ? Yet another thing that made radical suspension of belief utterly mandatory for seeing this movie. My forehead hurt because I smacked it too much during the movie. And was a "cool" priest supposed to cancel out the offense of the other religious psycho? Funny story: my wife & I weren't planning on seeing this movie. We were planning on seeing that movie that stars Gwyneth Paltrow and starts with P. We made the decision quickly & hoped we got it right. During the "
  15. We have a theater production of MoV going on in Chicago & I thought I'd link to the review b/c much of it deals with the play itself & not the specific production. It seems like one advantage that the movie had was that it (like an operatic version) was an adaptation, so uncomfortable auxilliary scenes could be excised (instead of awkwardly downplayed as a theater product would presumably have to do). The author seems to make the point that the play is to some extent unredeemable & attempts at rendering it palatable will often fall short. And contradictions & inconsistencies
  16. Hmmm... smugness. Is it possible to be humbly smug? ;-)
  17. Good article, SDG. Sounds like the movie was mostly concerned with the sequence of events & a few basic character attributes, but the movie-makers didn't really "get it" in terms of the way Chesterton viewed the world & so fit Fr Brown into their understanding of the world instead? Speaking of movie adaptions of famous detectives (off-topic apologies in advance), can there be any worse than the black & white movie version of Miss Marple who bested the villain in a swordfight? Spunky old lady, that.
  18. This might be stating the obvious, but I think Sherlock Holmes works so well as a detective character b/c detective stories play into the Enlightenment longing for reason to triumph over the world around us, and Sherlock Holmes is seems to be a veritable embodiment of those rationalistic ideals. And he gives the aura of invincibility, whereas Fr Brown is humble & self-effacing. That's why I think Holmes will always be a the classic fictional detective. I think Conan Doyle also made effective use of elements of horror in his stories. Like exotic snakes crawling toward you in a darkene
  19. Thanks for the thoughts, all. Alan, I read this quickly & assumed I knew what you meant. Upon further reflection... what exactly did she hate?
  20. OK, I'm a neophyte posting among experts here, so pardon my lack of experience. But since the virtues of the movie have been well put here, I'll be a bit contrary as well, although it probably takes me into spoiler territory. When I first heard & read about the movie, I was worried about its anti-Semitic past & hoped the producers would be sensitive to that. (Perhaps I shouldn't have worried.) Then my wife & I saw it on DVD & liked it a lot. They did a lot to contextualize Shylock's behavior. Even though there's not avoiding its shocking & inhumane natural, you do fee
  21. I agree that the standards for righteousness generally get higher with Jesus' teaching. It's... almost as if... the only remaining option is grace.
  22. Saw that article, too. Very sad. It seems like it's hard for any traveling person, like an artist or an athlete, to have a normal family life. Not to feed overly on inference from sparse details, but she mentioned that she went to marriage counselling, but she didn't say that her former husband also did. Is this a hint? Is that a little bit like a man saying "We divorced, and I was awarded custody of the kids"?
  23. Also, some evangelicals are used to doing "battle" for various political causes associated with Christianity. This kind of thing came up on Another Discussion Board, and we decided to start a group called Quashers for Christ. Doesn't that have a nice ring to it? Then it was decided it would have to be a support group. Anecdote: I remember when my wife & I gave some money to Concerned Women for America for pro-life reasons (even though we have mixed feelings about the political stuff & usually channel our money to non-political causes) & then we got something in the mail that li
  24. Sorry to go back on topic, but I was just thinking about a number of common folk I've heard from that have been tripped up by the first page of the novel that says it's all based on fact. I've heard things like "He wouldn't say that if it weren't true." So, my point is, if this film starts with a similar message, any slim chance that traditional Christians would tolerate it are OFF. Memo to film-makers?
  • Create New...