Jump to content

A R Tist

Member
  • Content Count

    9
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About A R Tist

  • Rank
    Member
  • Birthday 03/07/1994

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    North Dublin
  • Interests
    Poetic Composition

Previous Fields

  • Occupation
    Unemployed
  • About my avatar
    A girl from my favorite film
  • Favorite movies
    Mes Petites Amoureuses
  • Favorite music
    Kotoko
  • Favorite creative writing
    Wyndham Lewis
  • Favorite visual art
    Wyndham Lewis

Recent Profile Visitors

53 profile views
  1. Only within the context of a socio-economic system, which is discovered by artists and economists.
  2. But are they preparing our children to become economists or high Modernist artists, so that they can change the world with their actions? Doesn't really matter how much you care, or how hard you work, if you aren't producing the people who are ready for this, or are ready to strive for it.
  3. Art which possesses neither public responsibility, nor aesthetic originality, is a very humble form of art. While for much of history, the concept of art did not yet exist, it is clear that there were works of art being produced. It may even be said that art came naturally to the rhapsodes who were later collectively referred to as Homer, when (initially) composing the lyrical interludes of the Iliad, and later making the whole poem lyrical. But these works necessarily laid emphasis on the side of themselves which were τέχνη, until the event of early Romanticism, as defined by Hamann and Herder, in opposition to Kant. It was not until Yeats' middle period that the idea of a unifying system of public responsibility (τέχνη) and aesthetic originality (art) became proper. Since the deaths of Eliot, Pound, Bunting, and others, High Modernism has been reacted against, by the humble Romanticism of gentlemen like Larkin (in England), and the Post-Modernist experiments of gentlemen like Ashbery (in America). My theory is that this is both caused by and contributing to the general downfall of our society, since verse used to, and no longer does, bother to influence society, in any meaningful manner. Until this idea has been revitalised, there may as well be no art at all, considering it simply stands as a kind of cask-monolith, pretending to do what it does not itself even understand.
  4. What is education today? A huge pile of shit.
  5. There are things which are absolutely non-art and there are things which are absolutely art. That being said, art is a transmogrifying concept, which cannot be accurately defined, only spuriously created and appreciated.
×
×
  • Create New...