Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Guest Russell Lucas

ALIEN vs. ALIENS

ALIEN vs. ALIENS: Which is superior?   42 votes

  1. 1. ALIEN vs. ALIENS: Which is superior?

    • The brooding, iconic Ridley Scott film "Alien"
      28
    • The entertaining, but still largely shoot-'em-up James Cameron film "Aliens"
      14

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

27 posts in this topic

Choose and forever be affiliated with one or the other. That is, good taste or bad taste.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Alien.

Alien is horror that is ABOUT something. Its sparse, spooky, and very well acted.

Aliens is a blockbuster sci fi film: first-rate at what it is, but it is not a horror film. It is a suspense/adventure film. I find more to think about with Alien. I like the performances better. Cameron comes off sometimes as just a more talented version of Michael Bay... He wants to awe us with the size of everything and the scale of everything. I'm not really bothered by it, but it feels more like entertainment than art to me.

Alien has Ian Holm.

Aliens has Lance Henricksen.

'Nuff said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Far be it from me to accuse anyone of question-framing... :roll:

I agree, however. It is no contest: Alien is the definite winner on all counts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like Lance Hendricksen!

"On all counts," Alvy? Surely you can't mean that Aliens does nothing better than Alien? Certainly, it's a more popular, less ambitious style of moviemaking, but surely Star Wars does some things better than 2001: A Space Odyssey or Close Encounters, and so does Aliens re. Alien.

For example, it's funnier. It's got more heart appeal. It has human relationships that matter more than any of the relationships in Alien. Sure, it's a big roller-coaster ride when all's said and done. I'm not sure what you would call Alien to extend the analogy, but whatever it is, I'm fairly certain I wouldn't consider that experience superior in every way to riding a roller coaster. smile.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw Aliens my freshman year in college and loved it. I just saw Alien last week and did not enjoy it nearly as much as I did the sequel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like Henricksen too, SDG. But as an actor, Ian Holm runs circles around him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good heavens. And so the multiplication of threads continues. To quote what I posted on the Alien: Director's Cut thread a couple days ago:

Saw it this morning. It was nice to get a refresher, since I hadn't seen the film in years, but I was reminded again of how much I prefer the sequel. It really does improve on a number of the original film's themes. (E.g., the bit where the android says he admires the "purity" of the alien, because it does not have "delusions of morality" etc., is one of the hoariest sci-fi clich

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[Retreats sheepishly to revise opinion.]

Alien is superior on most counts. wink.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[Retreats sheepishly to revise opinion.]

Alien is superior on most counts. wink.gif

Except for the important ones tongue.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This could be this Board's darkest day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

: The original film has a fair bit of style, but it's ultimately just another one of those

: a-monster-picks-people-off-one-by-one-as-they-leave-the-group-for-no-particular-good-reason-other-than-to-make-themselves-vulnerable

: flicks.

This is the perfect opportunity for me to ask: how many films did this *before* Alien? Halloween was released in '78, but are there any other significant films where this happens? Or perhaps I'm just showing my ignorance, and this was already a well-established plot element in scores of [b?] films since the 50's.

I showed both Alien and Aliens to a friend almost a year ago; he had previously seen neither. He was sorely disappointed in both.

He said he liked the first half of the first film, and that was all. Once we saw the alien for the very first time in the first film, he identified the formula and considered the rest of the film entirely predictable, including the very last scene, which was certainly effective for *me* when I saw it the first time.

The second one just bored him all the way through; he practically said it was torture.

I didn't know what to say to him other than that these plot elements, which are so common and clich

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to the main Alien series thread, where I posted my comments on the audio commentaries for the first, second, and fourth films (the third one kept putting me to sleep).

moquist wrote:

: This is the perfect opportunity for me to ask: how many films did this *before* Alien?

Good question. I've never really charted the genre prior to the existence of the ratings system, so I couldn't say. All I do know is that one of the things you frequently hear in making-of featurettes on the original Alien is that Harry Dean Stanton told Ridley Scott he didn't like these kinds of monster movies, and Scott said he didn't either, but he was going to try to make this one more stylish or something.

That, BTW, is one of many reasons why Cameron's film is superior to Scott's -- Cameron does not condescend AT ALL, in any way, to the genre; rather, he loves it, he lives it, he takes it to a place higher than it has ever been before; and, what's more, he does this while paying a great deal of respect to Scott's earlier film, and the spirit thereof.

: But according to Scott in the commentary, the studio just said "Hey! No sex?

: C'mon, fix that!".

Didn't Sigourney Weaver also some theory to the effect that Ripley and the Alien had a sexual connection, though? Cameron says Weaver wanted to incorporate this into the second film somehow, but she never got a chance to REALLY do it until the fourth film.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How much of Aliens greatness is based on the original version and how much on the special edition? I ask because, until I'd seen the longer cut I was very much of the mind that Alien was the hulking giant of greatness and Aliens, although faster and more intense than any other action film I'd seen, was just a pretty standard war film with the obligatory cute kid along for the ride. Where, funnily enough, we were just waiting for everyone to get picked off until someone decided to utter an immortal piece of dialogue along the lines of "If only we hadn't underestimated these darn aliens!" (Thank goodness they didn't)

The special editon makes the mother/daughter parallels more explicit without being gushing, gives Ripley a much more complete character arc and gives the film a sense of tense anticipation which seems to pay homage, but not steal, from the original film. I think Alien still does it for me but Aliens: Special Edition deserves to be on page 1 of the book: "What should a truly great sequel look like?"

Phil.

Edited by Shantih

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

: How much of Aliens greatness is based on the original version and how much on the

: special edition?

Ah - good thing to note. I've never seen the non-special Aliens.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, if I think of which Alien film I would most like to see again, I always find myself thinking of Alien:Resurrection. Not very helpful in this context, I agree.

I found Alien mostly formulaic. Like Moquist's friend, unfortunately when it becomes clear that there is a formula, horror/suspense films become comedy for me. The moments which momentarily shoved the formula aside are the most gripping, for example, Ash attempting to throttle Ripley with a rolled-up newspaper. Cue the arrival of the "penetration/fear of penetration/fear of male penetration/fear of enforced childbearing" theme. I get the most enjoyment out of the Alien films when they deal with this theme, along with Ripley's apprehension of/need to be loved by a man and mother to a child. Aliens deals with these themes interestingly (though IMHO not nearly as interestingly as Alien:Resurrection) and still manages to be a good tight creepy action film (though arguably as formulaic as Alien).

And, err, everyone should love Alien: Resurrection

Ben

Edited by Indigojones

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm. I found the climactic scenes of A:Rez to be almost unbearable. When Ripley confronts and disposes of Hulking Cream of Wheat Monster, I wept for the fate of the franchise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shantih wrote:

: How much of Aliens greatness is based on the original version and how much on

: the special edition?

I had never even seen the "special edition" until the Quadrilogy set came out last year, so my preference for Aliens over Alien is based on the theatrical version. But yeah, the "special edition" really, really adds something to the film. It's probably the only version I'll watch from now on.

Jeffrey Overstreet wrote:

: When Ripley confronts and disposes of Hulking Cream of Wheat Monster, I wept

: for the fate of the franchise.

Heck, I was mourning the fate of the franchise back when Alien3 killed off ALL the characters whose survival we celebrated at the end of the previous film. I don't think there was ANY way to bring any of those characters back without being rather silly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jeffrey Overstreet wrote:

: When Ripley confronts and disposes of Hulking Cream of Wheat Monster, I wept

: for the fate of the franchise.

Heck, I was mourning the fate of the franchise back when Alien3 killed off ALL the characters whose survival we celebrated at the end of the previous film.  I don't think there was ANY way to bring any of those characters back without being rather silly.

Ditto, ditto and ditto.

As to the first two, Alien has a special place in my heart because it was the first R-rated movie I saw without adult supervision (I was only 14 - but we'll keep that between us). And it scared me more than any film I had seen prior, save Jaws.

Aliens was great entertainment, but I don't remember even the slightest fear factor. I'd have to go with the first.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As to the first two, Alien has a special place in my heart because it was the first R-rated movie I saw without adult supervision (I was only 14 - but we'll keep that between us). And it scared me more than any film I had seen prior, save Jaws.

My mother bought us Aliens on video for my tenth birthday party. Let us say, it...polarised the audience of nine to eleven year olds. The girls left fairly early, and were followed pretty quickly by most of the others. I watched the rest with a friend of mine. He was relatively unaffected and would come around fairly regularly after school to watch the ONE scene which he loved - the chestburster coming out of the colonist. All I got was alien invasion anxiety and disturbed sleep for months.

Edited by Indigojones

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, if I think of which Alien film I would most like to see again, I always find myself thinking of Alien:Resurrection.

For all its faults it does have the best Sigourney Weaver performance, and most interesting Ripley characterisation, of the series.

Phil.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While Alien scared the pee-pee outta me, Aliens was a heckuva lot more fun thanks to the firepower, more aliens...especially the Queen, the inclusion of Newt (what the heck was Fincher thinking in Alien3???), and, of course, Bill Paxton as Hudson.

Game over man, Game Over!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, the end of Resurrection really bugged me -- except that the idea of Aliens coming to Earth is cool (We've seen this, of course, now with AvP -- which I really hope isn't included in "the canon."). Of course, the whole idea of cloning Ripley in the first place bugged me from the get-go of the film. I do want to watch it again now though since I found out Jeunet directed it -- I love his visuals. The first time I saw it was before I started watching movies... tongue.gif

Alien 3 I actually like and I even tried to defend it here once (I think it was on the old board) but Peter tore it up so badly even I couldn't remember why I liked it -- maybe because it was the first of the Alien movies I ever saw.

But, as to the question at hand, it appears I do agree with Peter here. I much prefer the sequel to the original. I really have to watch both of these again someday soon...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We could beat this subject to death pretty easily (if we haven't already), but since it hasn't been mentioned yet:

Aliens is 137 minutes long.

Alien is 117 minutes long.

Not only is Aliens derivative, it's also 20 minutes longer.

Sure, it's actiony and fun for a while, but the law of diminishing returns is very much in effect with Aliens.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Timothy Zila wrote:

: Aliens is 137 minutes long.

The theatrical version is, yes. The even better director's cut (which, I'm told, was the only version available on video for several years) is *154* minutes long.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0