Anders Posted May 19, 2009 Report Share Posted May 19, 2009 I wish I had more time to really delve into film, but in the end I get a lot more out of reading than I do out of participating in these kinds of conversations, since I tend to get really defensive about films I liked.[/threadjack]I understand. If someone were to say anything bad about The Three Amigos, I'd find a way to reach through the computer and punch them in the face. What if I told you I hadn't ever seen it! Quote "A director must live with the fact that his work will be called to judgment by someone who has never seen a film of Murnau's." - François TruffautTwitter.Letterboxd. Reviews and essays at Three Brothers Film. Link to post Share on other sites
M. Leary Posted May 19, 2009 Report Share Posted May 19, 2009 Admittedly again, I guess I misread you. I felt that your statement was a categorical rejection of anyone finding the film "believable." I would argue seriously with your impression, but MLeary and Andy have made my knee jerk ramblings feel a little immature. I had the same inclinations towards the film until recently, so premature may be better than immature. Quote "...the vivid crossing of borders between film and theology may save the film from the banality of cinema and festival business, and it may also save the church from the deep sleep of the habitual and the always known." (Hans Werner Dannowski) Filmwell | Twitter Link to post Share on other sites
MattP Posted May 19, 2009 Report Share Posted May 19, 2009 I wish I had more time to really delve into film, but in the end I get a lot more out of reading than I do out of participating in these kinds of conversations, since I tend to get really defensive about films I liked.[/threadjack]I understand. If someone were to say anything bad about The Three Amigos, I'd find a way to reach through the computer and punch them in the face. What if I told you I hadn't ever seen it! You would just make me sad. Quote "You guys don't really know who you're dealing with.""Oh yeah, and who exactly are we dealing with?""I'm the mother flippin' rhymenoceros." Link to post Share on other sites
Overstreet Posted July 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 22, 2009 (edited) Watched this again over the weekend with Anne. Loved every minute of it. The more I watch this film, the more I realize that Sidney really is a wonderful character. Some criticized the film saying Sidney's a "blank." But no, he isn't. Quiet? Yes. Sensitive? Very. Observant? Yes. Talented? Wise? Yes. And it really does make sense to me that the community has such a cultural/ethnic mix. One of the African American characters refers to his longtime friendship Rachel's father and his past involvement with a jazz combo at some point. They both have friends from the jazz world. Those in attendance at this pre-wedding gathering seem familiar with this history. And others in the community shows a lot of connection with colorful musical endeavors. Music is what's brought these families and traditions together. I've seen communities like this bond, cross-culturally, through music and art many times. I have no trouble believing in such a melting-pot of a gathering. I guess what you've experienced will greatly influence how plausible you find this community. But here's the real reason I'm bringing this up. Sidney is played by Tunde Adebimpe, who happens to be a member of the band TV on the Radio. I like his performance a lot, especially considering how it is a nice contrast to the more flamboyant characters. I said to Anne, "I'd like to see this guy in more movies." As soon as we finished watching the film, I told Anne it was her turn to pick our dinnertime movie for the next week. (We've been watching films in installments, due to our busy schedules.) So, out of our vast library of DVDs and VHS, she chose one that was unopened, one that was new to both of us. Jump Tomorrow. We put it in last night and started watching. And, to our amazement, who should be playing the tall, softspoken, soon-to-be-married, romantic lead? Tunde Adebimpe. Edited July 22, 2009 by Overstreet Quote P.S. I COULD BE WRONG. Takin' 'er easy for all you sinners at lookingcloser.org. Also abiding at Facebook and Twitter. Link to post Share on other sites
Thom Wade Posted July 23, 2009 Report Share Posted July 23, 2009 Watched this again over the weekend with Anne. Loved every minute of it. The more I watch this film, the more I realize that Sidney really is a wonderful character. Some criticized the film saying Sidney's a "blank." But no, he isn't. Quiet? Yes. Sensitive? Very. Observant? Yes. Talented? Wise? Yes. Doesn't sound macho or manly at all...therefore...a blank. Quote "You know...not EVERY story has to be interesting." -Gibby Link to post Share on other sites
Buckeye Jones Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 If beauty draws them into a sense of what is profound, I'm certainly not going to get in their way. I think they'd all benefit from drawing closer and closer to the sacred. But they do seem to believe in God, they don't recoil at the openly Christian sentiments of the African Americans, and that was rather refreshing for this moviegoer. I realize I'm pulling this out (and somewhat out of context) over a year later, but, hey, I just saw the movie. I found three things odd about Rachel Getting Married. 1) My head still hurts from the frying pan scene. You know, the one in which Kym is driving, sees a "fork in the road" sign, and then refuses to turn, crashing into the trees. Wasn't Frost from New England? The road less traveled, indeed. 2) The Indian-themed wedding. Didn't they see The Namesake? That wasn't a real Indian wedding. Good thing no actual Indians were invited. 3) Sidney's family. On a serious note, I think it was more important for the film to have black folk in it, than to have black folk in it. I really had my disbelief unsuspended at the rehearsal dinner and the wedding by Sidney's family's absolute lack of reaction to the randomness about the wedding. I think the white folks of Rachel Getting Married didn't recoil at the openly Christian (the grandmother comment?) because there was neither openly Christian nor African American culture on display. They were not people; they were ciphers for some grand lesson. And that lack of engagement with Sidney's family, and vice versa, of the family's engagement with the wedding events was a missed opportunity. Quote I have Flickritis Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.