Overstreet Posted December 23, 2013 Author Report Share Posted December 23, 2013 (edited) I love the understated cinematic qualities of it. I love the way the Las Vegas environments seem so desolate and lonely, emphasizing why Travis instinctively grabs hold of the lifeline of an authentic, meaningful relationship when he finds it. (There's a wonderful 360-degree turn as Travis realizes his new environment, and it is paralleled by a shot of Martin's lonely new apartment.) I love the shots of the eye tests, the way the auction lamp is lit as an indication of how Martin will put Travis "in the right light." I love the way Martin's apartment is shot, especially the shot of him pacing outside the window while talking on the phone. Somehow he turns, pauses, and smiles at perfect points without ever looking posed, and what that shot suggests about his willingness to "brave the cold" for relationships. I love the patience of Hartigan at the camera while Martin sits quietly and eats and reads. I love the weight of the sky applying pressure to the car where Martin and Travis are first getting acquainted. It's not cinematic in a showy way, but it isn't just "footage." Not by a long shot. Edited December 23, 2013 by Overstreet Quote P.S. I COULD BE WRONG. Takin' 'er easy for all you sinners at lookingcloser.org. Also abiding at Facebook and Twitter. Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Arkadin Posted December 23, 2013 Report Share Posted December 23, 2013 I don't know what a stronger "cinematic" quality could bring to the film beyond distraction from its careful observation of humanity. And I say this as guy who generally likes his cinema BIG. Quote I've Seen That Movie Too Link to post Share on other sites
SDG Posted December 23, 2013 Report Share Posted December 23, 2013 Oh, and another thing. That strong scene toward the end with the twist that's been pointed out above. Of course I loved it for the reasons that have been discussed above, but I also what to say: I'm not sure I've ever seen the pain and awkwardness of a long-absent parent and a grown child tentatively, fearfully trying to reconnect captured with more precision than that scene. Holy smokes. Quote “I write because I don’t know what I think until I read what I say.” — Flannery O'ConnorWriting at the new Decent Films | Follow me on Twitter and Facebook Link to post Share on other sites
Overstreet Posted December 23, 2013 Author Report Share Posted December 23, 2013 Oh, and another thing. That strong scene toward the end with the twist that's been pointed out above. Of course I loved it for the reasons that have been discussed above, but I also what to say: I'm not sure I've ever seen the pain and awkwardness of a long-absent parent and a grown child tentatively, fearfully trying to reconnect captured with more precision than that scene. Holy smokes. Secrets and Lies? That's what it reminded me of, although far more understated than Blethyn's spectacular meltdown. Quote P.S. I COULD BE WRONG. Takin' 'er easy for all you sinners at lookingcloser.org. Also abiding at Facebook and Twitter. Link to post Share on other sites
SDG Posted December 23, 2013 Report Share Posted December 23, 2013 Yeah, I see why you made that connection. (FWIW, I've seen Secrets and Lies, although it's been awhile.) To clarify, by "captured with more precision than in that scene" I was thinking of capturing such pain and awkwardness in a single scene, in a movie that wasn't primarily about that situation. Also, by "precision" I meant to suggest that instantly recognizable quality that runs through so many such relationships, i.e., the universality that comes through in the specificity of the characters. IIRC, Secrets and Lies devotes far more plot and screen time to developing the crucial relationship—and it's a pretty unusual situation, and I'm not sure it has the same universal quality this scene did. Quote “I write because I don’t know what I think until I read what I say.” — Flannery O'ConnorWriting at the new Decent Films | Follow me on Twitter and Facebook Link to post Share on other sites
Overstreet Posted December 23, 2013 Author Report Share Posted December 23, 2013 Yeah, you're right. S&L is a very unique situation, and an emotional fireworks show as a result. But the overdue meeting between parent and child is similarly up-close, and if I recall correctly it's performed in one long shot as they sit side by side at a cafe. Quote P.S. I COULD BE WRONG. Takin' 'er easy for all you sinners at lookingcloser.org. Also abiding at Facebook and Twitter. Link to post Share on other sites
Nick Olson Posted December 24, 2013 Report Share Posted December 24, 2013 FWIW: I posted an essayish review for Filmwell earlier this evening. Quote "What is inside is also outside." -Goethe via Merleau-Ponty, in conclusion to the latter's one extended rumination on filmFilmwell, Twitter, & Letterboxd Link to post Share on other sites
Buckeye Jones Posted January 3, 2014 Report Share Posted January 3, 2014 Really enjoyed this film, brimming with insight. Felt that it ran a few minutes too short--just as I was really invested in what comes next, it ends. Quote I have Flickritis Link to post Share on other sites
Jeremy Ratzlaff Posted January 8, 2014 Report Share Posted January 8, 2014 Beautiful, beautiful, beautiful. Love this thread. Loved this film. I love the way the Las Vegas environments seem so desolate and lonely, emphasizing why Travis instinctively grabs hold of the lifeline of an authentic, meaningful relationship when he finds it. (There's a wonderful 360-degree turn as Travis realizes his new environment, and it is paralleled by a shot of Martin's lonely new apartment.) That is exactly the moment that came to my mind when I scanned past Christian's comment concerning the film's cinematic quality. The pace of the camera matches that of the plot beautifully. There were a few moments that made me think, "ah hah, indie film," but for the most part the composition felt relaxed and confident, never trying too hard and yet never being dull. There was a rich maturity to the film, not only in the character dynamics but also in the way it was shot. Great colors. Incredible use of the frame. Aesthetically, it was a pleasant experience. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Persona Posted January 14, 2014 Report Share Posted January 14, 2014 I liked this film quite a bit, for the reasons mentioned here, up until the last fifteen minutes or so, and then I think I started really liking it. The connection I made near the film's end was to The Loneliest Planet. When Martin returns from his "phone call," he is in one moment making a decision that is going to impact the situation at large and change things for years to come. I don't think he can possibly know the impact his decision is going to have -- he is simply following his own gut, his own "instinct" (the word that has been used many times in discussing the decision made by Bernal in The Loneliest Planet). There are certainly quite a few ways to dissect and discuss this quiet little movie. To me, that's proof of its strength. Quote In an interstellar burst, I am back to save the Universe. Filmsweep by Persona. 2013 Film Journal. IlPersona. Link to post Share on other sites
Christian Posted March 11, 2014 Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 The Muriel Awards caught Paul Eenhorn's eye. (See his brief comment at the end of the long post.) Quote "What matters are movies, not awards; experiences, not celebrations; the subjective power of individual critical points of view, not the declamatory compromises of consensus." - Richard Brody, "Godard's Surprise Win Is a Victory for Independent Cinema," The New Yorker Link to post Share on other sites
Tyler Posted August 19, 2014 Report Share Posted August 19, 2014 Going off Netflix streaming on August 20th. Quote It's the side effects that save us. --The National, "Graceless"Twitter Blog Link to post Share on other sites
Andrew Posted June 1, 2020 Report Share Posted June 1, 2020 Very cool! I need to catch up with his 2016 film Morris from America, and keep an eye out for Little Fish (reportedly completed and seeking a distributor). Quote To be an artist is never to avert one's eyes. - Akira Kurosawa https://www.patheos.com/blogs/secularcinephile/ Link to post Share on other sites
Overstreet Posted June 1, 2020 Author Report Share Posted June 1, 2020 Hartigan was a special guest via Skype in my Glen Workshop film seminar in Santa Fe last summer. We watched Martin Bonner and then he joined us for 45 minutes of Q&A. It was great. He was so generous with his time and perspectives. Quote P.S. I COULD BE WRONG. Takin' 'er easy for all you sinners at lookingcloser.org. Also abiding at Facebook and Twitter. Link to post Share on other sites
Overstreet Posted February 4 Author Report Share Posted February 4 I'm interviewing Chad Hartigan tomorrow about his new film Little Fish. Has anyone here seen it yet? It's uncanny about how pandemic-focused this project was already before the pandemic hit. Anybody have a burning question for him? I'm happy to take suggestions. Quote P.S. I COULD BE WRONG. Takin' 'er easy for all you sinners at lookingcloser.org. Also abiding at Facebook and Twitter. Link to post Share on other sites
kenmorefield Posted February 4 Report Share Posted February 4 Jeff, I doubt this is what you want to talk about with Chad, but I am interested in the *mechanics* of filming during (this stage) of the pandemic. Have most productions resumed? Is he just on hiatus? Is it different for small indies (do they have to deal with unions?) That sort of stuff. Quote 1More Film Blog Faith and Spirituality in Masters of World Cinema Faith and Spirituality in Masters of World Cinema, Volume II Link to post Share on other sites
Overstreet Posted February 4 Author Report Share Posted February 4 Sure, I can ask about that. Quote P.S. I COULD BE WRONG. Takin' 'er easy for all you sinners at lookingcloser.org. Also abiding at Facebook and Twitter. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.