Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Evan C

The Handmaiden

13 posts in this topic

Has anyone seen this yet? I thought we had a few Park Chan-Wook fans around here.

Anyway, it's one of his most effortlessly filmed movies. He clearly enjoys setting up and spinning all the elaborate wheels as he explores some of the darkest elements of humanity he's explored yet. As a warning, if you've struggled with the content in his other films, you should probably stay far away from this.

I threw up some quick first thoughts on Letterboxd.

Quote

You think you know how it's going to end, and you're right. What you don't know is the 10+ twists it will getting to that ending, as the despicable actions of all the characters become more devious, more convoluted, more shocking, and more sinister. My only small complaint is during Part II, when Chan-wook is revealing all the pieces to the puzzle, he didn't need to repeat quite as many scenes as he did, but that was just two or three brief moments. As a story which spins its devious web around elaborate manipulations, pornography, objectification of women, sadism, and bizarre tortures, Chan-wook lets all hell break loose as he explores the darker aspects of humanity. I'm not going to argue this is anything other than trash, but it's meticulously crafted, breathtakingly filmed trash.

 

Edited by Evan C

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you've seen one of the Park films that established his reputation, you know what you're signing up for.

The Handmaiden is, indeed, Park operating at the peak of his directorial powers, effortlessly blending tones and flourishes into something incredibly alive and intoxicating.

Colin Stacy's insightful review says everything I'd want to say about it and then some.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After thinking over this film for the past month, and after reading Colin's phenomenal review, I am ready to rescind that last sentence from my Letterboxd review. The Handmaiden has quite a bit of insight regarding pornography and male objectification of women. Honestly, I'm considering the possibility that this is Park's best film.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Colin's review is excellent. I would be okay with calling this his best film in the sense that it is his clearest, most sumptuous, precise, and delicately rendered version of Park. The interiors here are so exquisite and sustained, even compared to Stoker and Thirst. His odd sense of history is also present, in that while the story is staged in the past, everything Park does feels like science fiction. I am not sure how to describe that, frankly. But all of his films exist in a Park universe containing elements of the past and future at the same time, charging their sense of the present with the timeless and prophetic. When PKD writes period pieces, you get the same vibe (e.g. UBIK).

I would be curious, Evan, what you think about Thirst given that it has a few of the same sexual elements appearing in a Catholic symbolic world. I recall many responding to that film the same way you initially responded to this one.

Edited by M. Leary

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, M. Leary said:

I would be curious, Evan, what you think about Thirst given that it has a few of the same sexual elements appearing in a Catholic symbolic world. I recall many responding to that film the same way you initially responded to this one.

I think as soon as I finish the Ecumenical Jury nominees and other top ten year end contenders, I'll move Thirst to the top of my to-watch list.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, M. Leary said:

Colin's review is excellent. I would be okay with calling this his best film in the sense that it is his clearest, most sumptuous, precise, and delicately rendered version of Park. The interiors here are so exquisite and sustained, even compared to Stoker and Thirst. His odd sense of history is also present, in that while the story is staged in the past, everything Park does feels like science fiction. I am not sure how to describe that, frankly. But all of his films exist in a Park universe containing elements of the past and future at the same time, charging their sense of the present seem timeless and prophetic. When PKD writes period pieces, you get the same vibe (e.g. UBIK).

Yes to all of that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Evan C said:

I think as soon as I finish the Ecumenical Jury nominees and other top ten year end contenders, I'll move Thirst to the top of my to-watch list.

Oh, Park's Thirst has really stuck with me. I look forward to your thoughts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the thread on Thirst. I thought I had contributed to it, but apparently not. Ryan linked there the interview with Park that sent me down a rabbit hole into Catholic imagery in Korean horror cinema (which is oddly notable in this genre - e.g. The Wailing, I Saw the Devil, ThirstPieta, Blood Pledge). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess this good old Tennessee boy just isn't sophisticated enough to appreciate the "meta-critique of the male gaze" in watching a couple of skinny nubile ladies scissoring.  It looked an awful lot like soft core pornography with a thin ice crust of rationalization scattered on the top.  I guess I just need to steer clear of films by Chan-wook Park for a while, since I pretty much hated Snowpiercer and Oldboy, but I was lured in by all of the praise his newest film has received (including Best Foreign Language Film from the critics' association I belong to).  

This is somewhat analogous to my recent reaction to Elle, which struck me as superficially feminist while turning out to be rather misogynistic, to the point of including a "she really wanted it" rape narrative.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that a very fair response to any of Park's films, Andrew. I have never thought he was the sort of director who has things figured out enough to make films about abstractions like "the male gaze." He makes films about the messiness of human passions, as being intertwined with carnal, religious, historical, etc... impulses.

But he has a brilliant insight into the raw language of cinema - and he has used that insight to depict human passions in a unique way.

To push his films much harder than that reads too much into what he does. I know it always sounds like a cop out to say someone's cinema is resistant to traditional film critical language, but Park's films really are. And as such, you kind of dig them or you don't. I think it telling that fans of the macabre and grand guignol are attracted to his films more than others, even though they aren't straight horror.

Edited by M. Leary

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Andrew said:

 I guess I just need to steer clear of films by Chan-wook Park for a while, since I pretty much hated Snowpiercer and Oldboy, but I was lured in by all of the praise his newest film has received (including Best Foreign Language Film from the critics' association I belong to).  

FYI, SNOWPIERCER was Bong Joon-ho. But point taken.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, Park was a producer on Snowpiercer, so he might have had a little artistic input there.

Anyway, I second everything M. said. Park is the sort of director you either really dig or you hate, and I don't have any argument with anyone who hates him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oops!  I scanned Park's film list at Rotten Tomatoes and missed the director/producer distinction.  I should've checked at imdb instead.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0