Jump to content
Brian D

Film Club Oct - Nov 2017 - High and Low

Recommended Posts

I will start this Film Club thread with a goofy ad filled with sensational blurbs meant to get you to watch Kurosawa’s High and LowEasy to rent on Amazon or ITunes.

 

“HIGH AND LOW is really great…if we went with it I'd be more than happy to re-watch. I mean,  Kurosawa!” - NBooth

 I'd be excited to watch anything by these directors!” – Rob Z

“Let's go with High and Low.  I'll try to start a thread soon!” – Brian D

“HIGH AND LOW is high on my to-watch list for my PhD research!” – Joel Mayward

 

 

I hope you are inspired to watch with us!!!

 

Edited by Brian D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Other (more serious) stuff meant to get you to watch High and Low :

 

 

-A.O. Scott on High and Low : “One of the best detective thrillers ever filmed.”


- Roger Ebert on High and Low (sort of spoiler): “Few Japanese directors would have thought to adapt one of Ed McBain's crime stories, for example, but Kurosawa, reading King's Ransom, found the materials for one of his most challenging films, "High and Low" (1962). In it, a wealthy man is told his son has been kidnapped. He must sell everything to raise the ransom. Then it's discovered that the kidnapper mistakenly kidnapped the son of the millionaire's chauffeur instead. Is this boy worth the same ransom? As the eyes of the millionaire and the workingman meet in a shot of stunning power, Kurosawa confronts the question of whether all lives are equal.”

 

 

-In a 3-way tie with 2 other Kurosawa films for 1st place on Guillermo del Toro’s favorite Criterion films list.

 

-#3 on Scott Derrickson’s list of his favorite Kurosawa films.  On A & F, he noted that the top 20 on his list are all masterpieces.  To emphasize the point, High and Low was #3.

Edited by Brian D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Questions: (lots of spoilers!)

-What did you love about this film?  What did you struggle with?

-Haunted by the final shot of the faces interposed.  How does this scene and this shot impact the film?

-How does the title interact with the film?  Why High and Low?  It's adapted from a novel called King's Ransom, which could signify a different meaning and intention.

-Do you have any thoughts about Gondo's change of course?  What prompted it?  What does it mean for you as you look at the film as a whole?

-Fascinating that this is on Joel's list of films to watch for his PhD research.  Joel, can you please share more about that? 

-For those who know Kurosawa's works well: does this relate or compare in interesting ways with his other films? 

-Mystified by the intern and the way the film associates him with dead-end poverty.  Help me out, someone...am I understanding this right?  Extrapolating from modern Western societies, this intern would eventually be able to make a good deal more money a few years down the road.  Would an intern like this have been in a different situation at this time in Japanese history?  Perhaps I don't understand this character's profession correctly. 

-Share your own questions as well!

Edited by Brian D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

HIGH AND LOW is one of my favorite Kurosawas as well. It's a master class in directing, script, and in acting, particularly from Mifune and Nakadai. If you only know those two from Samurai pictures, this will greatly expand your understanding of their achievement as film actors.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When you mentioned Nakadai, I took a look to see who he played in the film.  I was just recalling how his and the Bosun character register so strongly as characters with seemingly almost no introduction at all.  If I go by this example, I would say that Kurosawa has a gift for bringing in characters that arrive in a film fully formed, as if you had met them before or were instantly familiar with them. 

Yes, a master class indeed on all of those levels.  I'd like to add that the sound design of the film is masterful....especially in the sounds of the final scene and in one of the climactic scenes in which the music seems incongruous but overwhelming.  And that telephone, signaling another round of dread with each ring...  The final scene's jarring sounds could in fact be seen as illustrations of a certain desperate state of the soul. 

 

 

Edited by Brian D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As to a couple of Brian's questions, I thought the title High and Low referred to stations in life of the characters, which was mirrored by the locations of where they lived.  And I understood the character working in the hospital to be some sort of orderly, which wouldn't be someone who was on his way up in life.

I'm used to Kurosawa films with Mifune being period pieces (I haven't seen Stray Dogs), so this was an interesting change.  I liked the 60s fashions, not that they were striking in any particular way but just because it strikes a chord of nostalgia in me since the 60s is when I grew up.  (I had the same reaction to A Serious Man.)  Did anyone else think some the joking on the part of the detectives seemed out of place?  It wasn't the usual sardonic police humor, but more of a sense of laughing a bit at Gondo's misfortune.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not to interrupt the flow, here, but I got my habds on a copy of this and will be watching this weekend. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Froggy said:

As to a couple of Brian's questions, I thought the title High and Low referred to stations in life of the characters, which was mirrored by the locations of where they lived.  And I understood the character working in the hospital to be some sort of orderly, which wouldn't be someone who was on his way up in life.

I'm used to Kurosawa films with Mifune being period pieces (I haven't seen Stray Dogs), so this was an interesting change.  I liked the 60s fashions, not that they were striking in any particular way but just because it strikes a chord of nostalgia in me since the 60s is when I grew up.  (I had the same reaction to A Serious Man.)  Did anyone else think some the joking on the part of the detectives seemed out of place?  It wasn't the usual sardonic police humor, but more of a sense of laughing a bit at Gondo's misfortune.

That's an interesting question about the joking of the police detectives.  There may be some truth to the idea that the breezier tone of the middle-act police investigation scenes is at odds with the gravity of the 1st and 3rd acts.  Honestly, though, I enjoyed those investigation scenes so much that it didn't occur to me.  I coasted along with them, delighted that such a high-level filmmaker as Kurosawa would stoop down to revel not only in the twisty crime logistics but also in the very lively humor of those police discussions.  Those police meetings seem like deep dives into the genre of the police procedural, yet with a crackling energy and levity. 

I can see, though, how the film when viewed as a whole might break down a little from that sharp tonal shift in the middle.  It makes it slightly more difficult to piece it together in our minds as a complete work.  The 1st and 3rd acts, though, are also not without their own dark humor and crime genre elements.

This is so fun to talk about... would love to hear what others think of this issue.

Edited by Brian D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 25/10/2017 at 7:16 PM, Brian D said:

-Fascinating that this is on Joel's list of films to watch for his PhD research.  Joel, can you please share more about that? 

My research is focused on the films of the Dardennes, and they recently gave a list of 79 of their "favorite" films to a Belgian film website, which was picked up at Indiewire. The list is fascinating to me for the themes and connections between films, both in style and content. Social realism prevails on the list, as do coming-of-age or films about childhood. Lots of urban landscapes and visions of poverty or the underbelly of society. They also include a lot of films which are noteworthy for their ethical dilemmas, ones where both the characters and the audience are forced to reckon with complex moral choices, usually involving mortality. From Kurosawa, they listed Ikiru, Red Beard, and High and Low

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, so not-bad-but-pressing-personal-life-stuff obviously kept me from watching this movie before yesterday. Like I mentioned when the film was suggested, I saw this movie (and liked it) a while back. Revisiting it confirmed that response; this is such a clean movie--by which I mean all the pieces fit together like clockwork. It's tight. The second half of the movie, involving the police-work, isn't what some folks would call exciting (it's procedural in the purest sense), but watching a room full of professionals do their thing well always holds a certain attraction to me. 

I was struck by how neatly the movie divides into two halves. The first half--which could be a movie in itself (a Hitchcock thriller, perhaps)--is, I think, markedly different in tone and focus than the second half, which is (as I say) much more strictly procedural. And I guess there's a corresponding shift between the high of the wealthy shoe manufacturer and the low of the beat cops and such (and, of course, this is a transition Mifune's character makes between halves as well, though he doesn't wind up quite as destitute as the kidnapper).

Obviously, there's a lot to talk about here regarding class issues, and the way the movie ends--abruptly, with the kidnapper (now killer) breaking into hysterical screams--suggests that Kurasawa is at least as interested in that aspect as he is in the cop or thriller elements. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are some interesting parallels between this story and the 1973 abduction and ransom of J. Paul Getty's grandson which is the story told in Ridley Scott's upcoming All the Money in the World. The kidnapping there was done by the mafia, but one of the actual kidnappers apparently was a hospital orderly. And it precipitated personal and familial disintegration for those targeted. 

On 10/25/2017 at 1:07 PM, magadizer said:

It's a master class in directing, script, and in acting, particularly from Mifune and Nakadai. If you only know those two from Samurai pictures, this will greatly expand your understanding of their achievement as film actors.

Always interesting to see actors in roles I’m not used to seeing them in. Mifune is phenomenal, and really made the film for me. Interesting to see that Nakadei also plays Lord Hidetora in Ran. Impressive.

On 10/25/2017 at 11:16 AM, Brian D said:

How does the title interact with the film?  Why High and Low?  It's adapted from a novel called King's Ransom, which could signify a different meaning and intention.

It looks like the literal translation of the title is "Heaven and Hell." I didn't read that until after watching the film, but I seem to remember the criminal talking about his life being a hell at the end, but I can't remember exactly. That seems more relevant to the second half of the film, a commentary on poverty of various kinds, whereas the first half seemed more about the class tension. Gondo's chauffeur seems far from the kind of poverty depicted in the second half, particularly of the drug addicts. 

On 10/26/2017 at 10:47 AM, Brian D said:

I can see, though, how the film when viewed as a whole might break down a little from that sharp tonal shift in the middle.  It makes it slightly more difficult to piece it together in our minds as a complete work.  The 1st and 3rd acts, though, are also not without their own dark humor and crime genre elements.

 

On 11/23/2017 at 4:20 PM, NBooth said:

I was struck by how neatly the movie divides into two halves. The first half--which could be a movie in itself (a Hitchcock thriller, perhaps)--is, I think, markedly different in tone and focus than the second half, which is (as I say) much more strictly procedural. And I guess there's a corresponding shift between the high of the wealthy shoe manufacturer and the low of the beat cops and such (and, of course, this is a transition Mifune's character makes between halves as well, though he doesn't wind up quite as destitute as the kidnapper).

It's a crime film through and through, but I agree that it's trying to be too films at once. I think the drama and conflict of the first half (especially what takes place before the camera ever leaves Gondo's house) is on par with performances I've seen of plays by Ibsen and Arthur Miller. Top notch. But the second half was very so-so by police procedural standards. I'm not at all familiar with the source material, but I'd be interested to know if it's following a shift that works smoother in prose fiction. Anyway, I would have loved it if the film had given us more than just hints at the transition Gondo goes through--the continued conflict within his character and between him and the other board members, and particularly his former assistant, the turncoat. His character was developed in the first half to be a complex character but then he almost completely dropped out, as did nearly everyone but the police and the kidnapper/killer who is introduced by the camera in the second half...how that was done seemed like a misstep in plotting as well, but it's hard to say why.

On 11/23/2017 at 4:20 PM, NBooth said:

Obviously, there's a lot to talk about here regarding class issues, and the way the movie ends--abruptly, with the kidnapper (now killer) breaking into hysterical screams--suggests that Kurasawa is at least as interested in that aspect as he is in the cop or thriller elements.

The final scene is also powerful, but not in the sustained way that the first half builds. Maybe if the first half hadn't been so much more compelling this wouldn't seem like an issue. But if the kidnapper had been present at the very beginning--if we had a sense of his motivations from the beginning, or his desperation before he knows his plan isn't going perfectly, or his moral quandry over aspects of his crimes--that would have made more sense with how the second half played out. But we didn't get that, and that would have detracted from the focus on Gondo, which is where I think the film's strength lies. I agree that Kurosawa is interested, but not to the point of investing his storytelling brilliance in that aspect of the film (the poverty, not just the class difference).

On 11/8/2017 at 12:19 PM, Joel Mayward said:

My research is focused on the films of the Dardennes, and they recently gave a list of 79 of their "favorite" films to a Belgian film website, which was picked up at Indiewire. The list is fascinating to me for the themes and connections between films, both in style and content. Social realism prevails on the list, as do coming-of-age or films about childhood. Lots of urban landscapes and visions of poverty or the underbelly of society. They also include a lot of films which are noteworthy for their ethical dilemmas, ones where both the characters and the audience are forced to reckon with complex moral choices, usually involving mortality. From Kurosawa, they listed Ikiru, Red Beard, and High and Low

This is a fascinating list, indeed! Especially because it's kind of what you'd expect to have influenced the Dardennes, as you say. They sure love Rossellini (9 out of 79)! Joel, if you ever do a longer blog post or something dissecting this list, please be sure to share it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey everyone, I have an idea for a film club movie for the month of February. A major blind spot for me is historical Black cinema, and I’d like to watch something in that category. I recently came across a book at the library called Hollywood Be Thy Name: African American Religion in American Film, 1929-1949 (2007) by Judith Weisenfeld, and it’s quite interesting (I love the play on “hallowed by thy name.”) One of the major topics of the book is “race films,” films made with black casts for black audiences (theatres were segregated back then) and often by black directors.

The one I’d like to pick for a film club discussion is The Blood of Jesus (1941) directed by Spencer Williams. I haven’t yet seen it, but from reading about it I know that it has several things going for it, in addition to its historical significance:

explicitly religious themes, which I think this group will find worthy of discussion,

a run time of just under an hour, so it should be easy to fit in a busy schedule, and

it’s on YouTube, so it will be easy to access.

What do you think? I’ll start a thread soon if others are interested.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/28/2018 at 9:42 PM, Rob Z said:

Hey everyone, I have an idea for a film club movie for the month of February. A major blind spot for me is historical Black cinema, and I’d like to watch something in that category. I recently came across a book at the library called Hollywood Be Thy Name: African American Religion in American Film, 1929-1949 (2007) by Judith Weisenfeld, and it’s quite interesting (I love the play on “hallowed by thy name.”) One of the major topics of the book is “race films,” films made with black casts for black audiences (theatres were segregated back then) and often by black directors.

 

The one I’d like to pick for a film club discussion is The Blood of Jesus (1941) directed by Spencer Williams. I haven’t yet seen it, but from reading about it I know that it has several things going for it, in addition to its historical significance:

 

explicitly religious themes, which I think this group will find worthy of discussion,

 

a run time of just under an hour, so it should be easy to fit in a busy schedule, and

 

it’s on YouTube, so it will be easy to access.

 

What do you think? I’ll start a thread soon if others are interested.

No takers?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm interested, but I fear I won't have the time available in this season. Still, I hope to find time to watch it.

Edited by Joel Mayward

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/1/2018 at 3:02 AM, Joel Mayward said:

I'm interested, but I fear I won't have the time available in this season. Still, I hope to find time to watch it.

Okay, thanks, Joel. I totally understand. I look forward to watching another film club film with you all at a time when we can swing it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×