Jump to content

NFL Begins


Spoon
 Share

Recommended Posts

being from philadelphia, i am trying to become an eagles fan. The problem is, I grew up a seahawks fan, and even though I don't like Seattle now, it's been hard to become a fan of another team. I like the eagles players but I've always found the fans to be annoying and obnoxious and dumb. I find myself wanting the eagles to lose so the fans can be miserable.

anyway, week 1. eagles had to be the most impressive no? Now that Donovan has a #1 WR, we will finally see what he is capable of.

Superbowl pick: eagles

underrated: bengals

overrated: packers

surprise player of the year, lee suggs.

any other predictions or rants?

"I am quietly judging you" - Magnolia

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This year the Seattle Seahawks are going to boiagknaksdk sjdglka klsjg sa;kl

aal;ksjdgggssa;lssadjg;lkjg aoibouujjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj

[falls asleep, head on keyboard]

P.S.  I COULD BE WRONG.

 

Takin' 'er easy for all you sinners at lookingcloser.org. Also abiding at Facebook and Twitter.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

C'mon, admit it: The Redskins have a good team this year.

Good enough to beat the Eagles? I don't know about that, but I'm hopeful.

As for your prediction that the Eagles will go to the Super Bowl: Haven't you been paying attention the past few years? If so, you'd know that the Eagles might make it to the NFC Championship game, but no further. tongue.gif

"What matters are movies, not awards; experiences, not celebrations; the subjective power of individual critical points of view, not the declamatory compromises of consensus." - Richard Brody, "Godard's Surprise Win Is a Victory for Independent Cinema," The New Yorker

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone want to give a preplexed Brit a quick rundown of who might be worth looking for in the headlines this year? I've started to develop a very casual interest in the Superbowl (thanks to Ben once making me watch it into the wee small hours. It becomes an addiction!) and would like to be slightly more informed this time around!

Phil.

"We live as if the world were as it should be, to show it what it can be." - Angel

"We don't do perms!" - Trevor and Simon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to say the 49ers will go all the way...But we all know thats not happening. I wouldnt be surprised actually to see New England back in the Super Bowl.

I would prob have to go with Eagles and i totally agree that the Packers are overrated.

As long as Mcnabb stays healthy i think they have agreat shot. Him and TO.

I have trouble following NFL tho living in Canada. Haha i just read up on this stiuff through NFL.com and team websites.

Keep this thread alive so i can keep up to date with NFL lol laugh.gif

Chow Guys.

"Whos more of the fool,the fool or the fool who follows". Obi-Wan Kenobi

Brent M.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone want to give a preplexed Brit a quick rundown of who might be worth looking for in the headlines this year?

Ha! You can expect next to nothing from the papers over here in terms of coverage of games. They'll always squeeze the scores into the small print along with the baseball and polo matches, but apart from that we can expect articles written by journos who are clearly scared to show to the British audience that they actually might like or even know something about the game, and instead go for that cute kind of British oh-I-don't-know-that-much-really-isn't-it-a-funny-world-this-american-football-lark angle. Quite detached stuff. Having said that, the Observer pullout did have an interesting few pages on Eli Manning recently. And you can always expect a page or two on the Superbowl, the tone of the coverage depending very much on how tense or dramatic the game ends up being. If it's tense, the Superbowl is presented as a reflection of America first, football game second. So, the two recent Patriots wins definitely come in this fawning category, whereas Tampa Bay over Oakland didn't really give much fuel for analysis.

w00t.gifw00t.gif GO PATRIOTS! w00t.gifw00t.gif

thanks to Ben once making me watch it into the wee small hours. It becomes an addiction!

And you're not the only one I have spread the bug to...mwahaha!

"Art is the most passionate orgy within man's grasp."

-- John Donne

My home page

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spoon:

anyway, week 1. eagles had to be the most impressive no? Now that Donovan has a #1 WR, we will finally see what he is capable of.

Actually, the big surprise for me was Westbrook's first 100+ rushing yards. First time he's ever done that. I think he's a fine HB, but I'm not sure that he's great. Hopefully, he'll keep up that 7.0 rushing average...

Go Eagles!

cool.gif

"It's a dangerous business going out your front door." -- J.R.R. Tolkien
"I want to believe in art-induced epiphanies." -- Josie
"I would never be dismissive of pop entertainment; it's much too serious a matter for that." -- NBooth

"If apologetics could prove God, I would lose all faith in Him." -- Josie

"What if--just what if--the very act of storytelling is itself redemptive? What if gathering up the scraps and fragments of a disordered life and binding them between the pages of a book in all of their fragmentary disorder is itself a gambit against that disorder?" -- NBooth

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, first a primer for the Brits. I'd recommend scanning various big city American newspapers (not the New York Times, sports is beneath them and they devote as little as possible space) like the Boston Globe, NY Daily News, Detroit News & Detroit Free Press, Washington's Post and Times. LA Times might be interesting, no team, big paper, for that sketch of the league sort of thing. ESPN.com has info up the wazoo, so to speak. I haven't checked TheSportingnews.com, but the magazine itself gives great capsule reporting of all teams in all major American sports except Hockey let_it_all_out.gif

HOW 'BOUT THOSE LIONS!!!!! One down, fifteen to go (or 20 to go if Dre' Bly and Charles Rogers come to mind). Seriously, they looked awful on offense until they absolutely had to get into the endzone to win late in the game. But at least the road losing streak is over (record tying 24 straight). We'd a lost that game last year. If Hakim and Alexander can hang on to a pass, Joey Sunshine might have some targets this year.

"During the contest trial, the Coleman team presented evidence of a further 6500 absentees that it felt deserved to be included under the process that had produced the prior 933 [submitted by Franken, rk]. The three judges finally defined what constituted a 'legal' absentee ballot. Countable ballots, for instance, had to contain the signature of the voter, complete registration information, and proper witness credentials.

But the panel only applied the standards going forward, severely reducing the universe of additional basentees the Coleman team could hope to have included. In the end, the three judges allowed about 350 additional absentees to be counted. The panel also did nothing about the hundreds, possibly thousands, of absentees that have already been legally included, yet are now 'illegal' according to the panel's own ex-post definition."

The Wall Street Journal editorial, April 18, 2009 concerning the Franken Coleman decision in the Minnesota U.S. Senate race of 2008.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was surprised that the Packers won. I thought fa sure they were going to lose.

There was some good action this first week.

The catch in the Lions game...Cant remember who it was.

But that one handed juggleing catch was amazing.

"Whos more of the fool,the fool or the fool who follows". Obi-Wan Kenobi

Brent M.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The catch in the Lions game...Cant remember who it was.

But that one handed juggleing catch was amazing.

Rookie Roy Williams, one of our first round picks. He had the droppsies in pre-season. I for one, am happy to see him stepping up like that after Rogers went down (out indefinitely for shoulder surgery). We of course were hoping th two of them would torment defenses together, though.

"During the contest trial, the Coleman team presented evidence of a further 6500 absentees that it felt deserved to be included under the process that had produced the prior 933 [submitted by Franken, rk]. The three judges finally defined what constituted a 'legal' absentee ballot. Countable ballots, for instance, had to contain the signature of the voter, complete registration information, and proper witness credentials.

But the panel only applied the standards going forward, severely reducing the universe of additional basentees the Coleman team could hope to have included. In the end, the three judges allowed about 350 additional absentees to be counted. The panel also did nothing about the hundreds, possibly thousands, of absentees that have already been legally included, yet are now 'illegal' according to the panel's own ex-post definition."

The Wall Street Journal editorial, April 18, 2009 concerning the Franken Coleman decision in the Minnesota U.S. Senate race of 2008.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK now, bring on the Iggles! The Kitties actually have a running game! Fine job yesterday and we are two and oh for the first time in four years. And the Iggles don't have a run defense? Cool.

"During the contest trial, the Coleman team presented evidence of a further 6500 absentees that it felt deserved to be included under the process that had produced the prior 933 [submitted by Franken, rk]. The three judges finally defined what constituted a 'legal' absentee ballot. Countable ballots, for instance, had to contain the signature of the voter, complete registration information, and proper witness credentials.

But the panel only applied the standards going forward, severely reducing the universe of additional basentees the Coleman team could hope to have included. In the end, the three judges allowed about 350 additional absentees to be counted. The panel also did nothing about the hundreds, possibly thousands, of absentees that have already been legally included, yet are now 'illegal' according to the panel's own ex-post definition."

The Wall Street Journal editorial, April 18, 2009 concerning the Franken Coleman decision in the Minnesota U.S. Senate race of 2008.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK now, bring on the Iggles! The Kitties actually have a running game! Fine job yesterday and we are two and oh for the first time in four years. And the Iggles don't have a run defense? Cool.

heehee. heeheehee.

HEY! It'd be nice if Rush were to denigrate Herrington's abilities and contribution. We could use the boost. Remember though. You guys shellacked us without Dre' Bly, Cash, and Charles Rogers. Somebody calling WDFN today described OLineman Stockar MacDougle a "revolving door for Jevon Kearse". Herrington has not been harrassed like that in some time. Excuses all, I know, but the Kitties won 10 games in three years. We'll get there.

"During the contest trial, the Coleman team presented evidence of a further 6500 absentees that it felt deserved to be included under the process that had produced the prior 933 [submitted by Franken, rk]. The three judges finally defined what constituted a 'legal' absentee ballot. Countable ballots, for instance, had to contain the signature of the voter, complete registration information, and proper witness credentials.

But the panel only applied the standards going forward, severely reducing the universe of additional basentees the Coleman team could hope to have included. In the end, the three judges allowed about 350 additional absentees to be counted. The panel also did nothing about the hundreds, possibly thousands, of absentees that have already been legally included, yet are now 'illegal' according to the panel's own ex-post definition."

The Wall Street Journal editorial, April 18, 2009 concerning the Franken Coleman decision in the Minnesota U.S. Senate race of 2008.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

HOW 'BOUT MY LIONS! They NAILED poor Vick's A**! Excellent performance by the defense with rookie standouts. Offense didn't blow it despite losing Roy Williams now, in addition to Rogers. Herrington actually out played Vick.

"During the contest trial, the Coleman team presented evidence of a further 6500 absentees that it felt deserved to be included under the process that had produced the prior 933 [submitted by Franken, rk]. The three judges finally defined what constituted a 'legal' absentee ballot. Countable ballots, for instance, had to contain the signature of the voter, complete registration information, and proper witness credentials.

But the panel only applied the standards going forward, severely reducing the universe of additional basentees the Coleman team could hope to have included. In the end, the three judges allowed about 350 additional absentees to be counted. The panel also did nothing about the hundreds, possibly thousands, of absentees that have already been legally included, yet are now 'illegal' according to the panel's own ex-post definition."

The Wall Street Journal editorial, April 18, 2009 concerning the Franken Coleman decision in the Minnesota U.S. Senate race of 2008.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was a fan of the Seahawks beginning in the year when Dave Kreig kind of replaced Jim Zorn. I moved to Germany a few years later, and never really became re-acacquainted with the team. I guess I am too much of a fair-weather fan, and we all know about the weather in Seattle...In any case, it seems there is a spark of hope at the beginning of each season, they start out winning their first three or something, then by the end of the season..."I coulda been a contender..."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...