Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Guest

WHO will win the SUPERBOWL?

Who will in the Superbowl, and by how much?  

15 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Speaking of which, is everybody taking their $1 to church for the SouperBowl?


A foreign movie can't be stupid.

-from the film
Armin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont' have a real vested interest in this, but I'll take the Eagles this year. If the Red Sox can win after a drought, so can the city of Philly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Been a Brady fan since his college days. It'd be nice to see him get a few more rings in my opinion. This is one of the few times I root for a Boston (environs) team.


"During the contest trial, the Coleman team presented evidence of a further 6500 absentees that it felt deserved to be included under the process that had produced the prior 933 [submitted by Franken, rk]. The three judges finally defined what constituted a 'legal' absentee ballot. Countable ballots, for instance, had to contain the signature of the voter, complete registration information, and proper witness credentials.

But the panel only applied the standards going forward, severely reducing the universe of additional basentees the Coleman team could hope to have included. In the end, the three judges allowed about 350 additional absentees to be counted. The panel also did nothing about the hundreds, possibly thousands, of absentees that have already been legally included, yet are now 'illegal' according to the panel's own ex-post definition."

The Wall Street Journal editorial, April 18, 2009 concerning the Franken Coleman decision in the Minnesota U.S. Senate race of 2008.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would not be surprised at all if the eagles win. I've never seen a defense play better and more frigthening then they played the last two games, against two of the best offesnes in the league. Culpepper and Vick were scared, and rightfully so. At least they could run. Brady can not and the patriots will lose a low scoring close game.


"I am quietly judging you" - Magnolia

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And who'd have thought that TO would have made such a significant and continuing contribution throughout the entire game? I'm no fan of his, but my hat is off to him today.

Also on the Pats' side. A linebacker scores two touchdowns lining up as a tight end on offense. Excellent.


"During the contest trial, the Coleman team presented evidence of a further 6500 absentees that it felt deserved to be included under the process that had produced the prior 933 [submitted by Franken, rk]. The three judges finally defined what constituted a 'legal' absentee ballot. Countable ballots, for instance, had to contain the signature of the voter, complete registration information, and proper witness credentials.

But the panel only applied the standards going forward, severely reducing the universe of additional basentees the Coleman team could hope to have included. In the end, the three judges allowed about 350 additional absentees to be counted. The panel also did nothing about the hundreds, possibly thousands, of absentees that have already been legally included, yet are now 'illegal' according to the panel's own ex-post definition."

The Wall Street Journal editorial, April 18, 2009 concerning the Franken Coleman decision in the Minnesota U.S. Senate race of 2008.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding this year's Super Bowl, I would say "Don't count out the Seattle Seahawks."

But Seattle is famous for raising the hopes of the fans all the way to the championship and then spectacularly collapsing just when it seemed a sure thing.

So.... WE WON'T GET FOOLED AGAIN!! ::rock::

Edited by Jeffrey Overstreet

P.S.  I COULD BE WRONG.

 

Takin' 'er easy for all you sinners at lookingcloser.org. Also abiding at Facebook and Twitter.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gosh, old topics. I was like, "Wait - the Eagles?! WHAT?!" Then I realized. :P

As for this year, I'm hopelessly rooting for the 'Skins. How could I do otherwise?


That's just how eye roll.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With the Lions typically WAY out of the picture, I'm going with the Pats again. Came on real strong at the end, but we'll see if they can get past Indy first.


"During the contest trial, the Coleman team presented evidence of a further 6500 absentees that it felt deserved to be included under the process that had produced the prior 933 [submitted by Franken, rk]. The three judges finally defined what constituted a 'legal' absentee ballot. Countable ballots, for instance, had to contain the signature of the voter, complete registration information, and proper witness credentials.

But the panel only applied the standards going forward, severely reducing the universe of additional basentees the Coleman team could hope to have included. In the end, the three judges allowed about 350 additional absentees to be counted. The panel also did nothing about the hundreds, possibly thousands, of absentees that have already been legally included, yet are now 'illegal' according to the panel's own ex-post definition."

The Wall Street Journal editorial, April 18, 2009 concerning the Franken Coleman decision in the Minnesota U.S. Senate race of 2008.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Noticing the title of this thread as I was checking for responses, I thought that it should be stipulated that once again, the World Health Organisation has absolutely no chance in this year's Super Bowl.

Edited by Rich Kennedy

"During the contest trial, the Coleman team presented evidence of a further 6500 absentees that it felt deserved to be included under the process that had produced the prior 933 [submitted by Franken, rk]. The three judges finally defined what constituted a 'legal' absentee ballot. Countable ballots, for instance, had to contain the signature of the voter, complete registration information, and proper witness credentials.

But the panel only applied the standards going forward, severely reducing the universe of additional basentees the Coleman team could hope to have included. In the end, the three judges allowed about 350 additional absentees to be counted. The panel also did nothing about the hundreds, possibly thousands, of absentees that have already been legally included, yet are now 'illegal' according to the panel's own ex-post definition."

The Wall Street Journal editorial, April 18, 2009 concerning the Franken Coleman decision in the Minnesota U.S. Senate race of 2008.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think my picks (which will probably serve as the kiss of death on Sunday) would be for the Colts to beat Da Bears in XL.


A foreign movie can't be stupid.

-from the film
Armin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And now we don't have to listen to the Washington fight song anymore!


A foreign movie can't be stupid.

-from the film
Armin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ALL RIGHTY THEN!!

::w00t::

ONCE AGAIN, a pro Seattle team has galvanized the city by exceeding expectations and performing beautifully. If they want to continue in grand Seattle form, they'll completely and totally blow it either in the championship or the Super Bowl... most likely the championship. Seattle... frequently the amazing underdog, but never the champ.


P.S.  I COULD BE WRONG.

 

Takin' 'er easy for all you sinners at lookingcloser.org. Also abiding at Facebook and Twitter.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...