#1
Posted 22 May 2008 - 01:27 PM
Do you have any favorite news feeds? Feeds about music, film, etc?
I thought it would be just another distraction, but I'm actually benefitting from this (yet another) social-networking site. (I know, I'm very very late to this party.)
#2
Posted 23 May 2008 - 01:29 AM
#3
Posted 24 May 2008 - 02:13 PM
#4
Posted 15 January 2009 - 04:03 PM
But now I have no idea what I'm meant to be doing. And even having read a few bits and pieces on it the point of it is still lost on me.
So is anyone else in there? And if so can they give me some tips?
Matt
#5
Posted 15 January 2009 - 05:19 PM
http://twitter.com/Jeff_Overstreet
#7
Posted 15 January 2009 - 07:01 PM
Does it record changes to facebook status in twitter
Or record changes to twitter in facebook
Or both?
Matt
#8
Posted 15 January 2009 - 07:15 PM
#9
Posted 15 January 2009 - 09:47 PM
In general, I'm with Alan. For me, there's little difference between tweets, Facebook status updates, short blog posts, tumbelogging, etc. I'd probably use Twitter (and Facebook) a whole lot more if I hadn't spent so much configuring my website to send out short little "microblog" posts (or "elsewheres", as I call them on the site).
I find Darren Hughes' discussion of how he uses Twitter (and other online tools) really interesting.
#10
Posted 15 January 2009 - 10:42 PM
Edited by Overstreet, 15 January 2009 - 10:42 PM.
#11
Posted 24 March 2009 - 11:37 AM
Matt
#12
Posted 29 March 2009 - 04:45 PM
#14
Posted 31 March 2009 - 03:23 AM
Anyway, it occurred to me the other day that, in this country at least, we have this strange thing where people are opposed to the big-brotherness of all the CCTV cameras we have, but don't really realise that the ideas in 1984 necessarily require ordinary citizens to be complicit in their own imprisoning. So perhaps the CCTV isn't the problem so much as the ground many of us are giving by posting photos and describing the minutiae of everyday lives. We don't need to government to do it, we're doing it for ourselves. The next step closer will follow fairly soon when the first people get sacked for saying something inappropriate on Twitter.
Matt
#15
Posted 18 April 2009 - 04:44 PM
http://twitter.com/tonywatkins_
#16
Posted 19 April 2009 - 08:19 PM
Guardian article
All a bit weird.
I mostly use it for the professional updates: David Lynch, Gus Van Sant, SF MoMA, Magnum photos always has great links that serve for 5 minutes distraction. A friend of mine that manages a UK version of ticketmaster has also floated the idea of updating ticket releases on there, which I would find much more useful than email bulletins. Don't know why, it's just the medium.
As for my own updates; its mostly out of boredom, not selfishness. And also because I am usually quite fond of new internet toys to mess around with. I still haven't got the hang of twitter, though, think it has a lot more potential than how I currently use it.
#17
Posted 20 April 2009 - 02:56 PM
That message may be a modern equivalent of Alexander Graham Bell's "Mr. Watson, come here. I want to see you." Brain-computer interfaces are no longer just a gee-whiz technology, but a platform for researchers interested in immediate real-world applications for people who can think, but can't move.
"We're more interested in the applications," said Justin Williams, head of the University of Wisconsin's Neural Interfaces lab. "How do we actually make these technologies useful for people with disabilities?"
The researchers built upon the BCI2000, a software tool pioneered by Williams and Wadsworth Center neural injury specialist Gerwin Schalk. The software translates thought-induced changes in a scalp's electrical fields to control an on-screen cursor.
#18
Posted 20 April 2009 - 06:54 PM
That message may be a modern equivalent of Alexander Graham Bell's "Mr. Watson, come here. I want to see you." Brain-computer interfaces are no longer just a gee-whiz technology, but a platform for researchers interested in immediate real-world applications for people who can think, but can't move.
"We're more interested in the applications," said Justin Williams, head of the University of Wisconsin's Neural Interfaces lab. "How do we actually make these technologies useful for people with disabilities?"
The researchers built upon the BCI2000, a software tool pioneered by Williams and Wadsworth Center neural injury specialist Gerwin Schalk. The software translates thought-induced changes in a scalp's electrical fields to control an on-screen cursor.
And if my thought life could be seen
They'd probably put my head in a guillotine
-- Bob Dylan, 1964
#19
Posted 21 April 2009 - 10:54 AM
#20
Posted 29 April 2009 - 11:48 AM
This might be the funniest thing I've read in a long, long time — thanks, Peter!










