Greg Wolfe, on 09 February 2010 - 07:58 PM, said:
Top 100 -- RESULTS ARE IN!
Started by
Greg Wolfe
, Feb 05 2010 09:06 PM
35 replies to this topic
#21
Posted 10 February 2010 - 09:13 AM
We're changing the wording of the instructions to reflect that you no longer have to vote for every film.
#22
Posted 10 February 2010 - 04:35 PM
A question I'm not sure I've seen asked or answered: What is the metric that's going to be used for ranking the list? Points per voter (excluding "haven't seen"s)? Points per weighted vote (ehs)? Total points (or its essential equivalent, points per vote inclusive of "haven't seen"s)? Total points, after transposing the 1-to-5 scale to a minus-2-to-2 scale (thus counting "haven't seen"s as a -- on the non-transpositional scale -- 3 rather than 0)? An average of the normalized z-scores of points per weighted vote (ehs) and total points, disqualifying any film more than 2 standard deviations below the mean on either scale?
Dale
Dale
Edited by M. Dale Prins, 10 February 2010 - 04:36 PM.
#23
Posted 10 February 2010 - 05:02 PM
Dear Dale,
While I agree with you in wonder it doesn't negate the fact that you are still a nerd.
Yours truly,
Me.
While I agree with you in wonder it doesn't negate the fact that you are still a nerd.
Yours truly,
Me.
#25
Posted 10 February 2010 - 05:41 PM
What's the difference between voting 'Haven't Seen It' and not voting at all?
#26
#27
Posted 11 February 2010 - 11:11 PM
Dear Dale,
They never answered your question because you so confused them.
Yours truly,
Me again.
They never answered your question because you so confused them.
Yours truly,
Me again.
#28
Posted 12 February 2010 - 01:24 AM
Wait -- you want us to TELL you our secret algorithm (trademark, patent pending, all rights reserved)???
I mean, you honestly believe total transparency is a good thing? What about mystery?
All I can say now is that it is going to involve transpositional scale, fractal reversions, and dual carburetors.
What more do you need to know?
I mean, you honestly believe total transparency is a good thing? What about mystery?
All I can say now is that it is going to involve transpositional scale, fractal reversions, and dual carburetors.
What more do you need to know?
M. Dale Prins, on 10 February 2010 - 04:35 PM, said:
A question I'm not sure I've seen asked or answered: What is the metric that's going to be used for ranking the list? Points per voter (excluding "haven't seen"s)? Points per weighted vote (ehs)? Total points (or its essential equivalent, points per vote inclusive of "haven't seen"s)? Total points, after transposing the 1-to-5 scale to a minus-2-to-2 scale (thus counting "haven't seen"s as a -- on the non-transpositional scale -- 3 rather than 0)? An average of the normalized z-scores of points per weighted vote (ehs) and total points, disqualifying any film more than 2 standard deviations below the mean on either scale?
Dale
Dale
#31
#32
Posted 14 February 2010 - 05:26 PM
M. Dale Prins wrote:
: Some must -- otherwise, where would we get new Montanananians?
Immigration, my boy, immigration.
: Some must -- otherwise, where would we get new Montanananians?
Immigration, my boy, immigration.
#33
Posted 14 February 2010 - 06:18 PM
It was a rhetorical question, nerds.
#35
Posted 15 February 2010 - 09:53 PM
Darrel Manson wrote:
: Would someone here recognize a rhetorical question?
Recognize, and redefine.
(And now for some reason I want to sing Blondie's 'Fade Away, and Radiate'.)
: Would someone here recognize a rhetorical question?
Recognize, and redefine.
(And now for some reason I want to sing Blondie's 'Fade Away, and Radiate'.)










