NHL 2010-11 Season
#1
Posted 19 February 2011 - 03:30 AM
Does anyone else here follow hockey? It's really the only sport I keep up with. I'm a big Vancouver fan, although I also cheer for the Predators, Capitals and yes, even the Flames (Iginla's my favourite player).
But the past few days have been filled with some pretty big trades including the most recent STL-COL deal. Anyone have any thoughts on the trades or on the season so far?
#2
Posted 19 February 2011 - 09:02 AM
#3
Posted 19 February 2011 - 12:47 PM
It's fun to watch Hall, Eberle, and MPS, and there's hope for the future. But it's also been painful watching the team burn the best years of Hemsky's contract, and trying to sell us on a scorched earth rebuild. If Tambellini trades Hemsky, he better get 100 cents on the dollar.
So, yeah. I care about hockey.
#4
Posted 20 February 2011 - 09:33 PM
This is the best team we've ever had. The defense is in shambles but it looks like we could get them all back in time for the playoffs. Meanwhile, we keep winning!
#5
Posted 20 February 2011 - 11:25 PM
#6
Posted 24 February 2011 - 12:30 AM
I'm thinking this is Vancouver's best shot in a while. They've got depth on defence (as evidenced by how the likes of Tanev, Sauve, etc.. are playing), a good offence, although Raymond could stand to elevate his game an extra notch, and two great goaltenders. I think one of the main keys of the Canucks' success last season, this season, and in the next few season, is the fact that they're finally getting young players contributing (Raymond, Hansen, Hodgson) and they will in the future if Vancouver keep drafting well (something sorely lacking from the Burke era). The young players also play on rookie contracts, which allows the Canucks some extra cap space to spend on areas they need improvement on.
#7
Posted 24 February 2011 - 09:04 AM
I do wish they were in the eastern conference rather than the western conference (hint to future re-alignment experts: see, Columbus, Ohio is east, way east, of the Mississippi River). They'd be a shoe-in for the playoffs rather than sitting in 12th or 13th place.
#8
Posted 24 February 2011 - 12:52 PM
I've been a fan of the Pittsburgh Penguins since Mario Lemieux was a chain-smoking teen scoring phenom who learned to speak English by watching Three's Company reruns. (Aside: I wonder if Mario was the last elite athlete to be a regular smoker.) It's been an up-and-down ride over the past twenty-some years, but never more than in the last year. See the following:
Dateline, February, 2010-- Sidney Crosby scores the gold medal-winning goal in the Olympics. The team is the defending Cup champion, and is poised to become the first repeat champion since the Red Wings of '97 and '98. In the second round they go down in seven games to the Canadiens, punctuating it with a horrible home loss in game seven that is over by the end of the first period.
Dateline, December, 2010-- The team retools in the offseason and signs two high-end free agent blueliners to improve
team GAA. By December, after some early bumps, it's clear the strategy is working, as they run off ten wins in a row and sit at the top of the league standings. HBO does episode one of their pre-Winter Classic show, and portrays the Penguins as the cat's meow and the Capitals as underachievers coached by a slob.
The turning point comes in the Winter Classic: Evgeni Malkin converts a breakaway to put the home team up 1-0, then absolutely everything falls apart. The Capitals score the next three and win the game. Crosby is hit by a 6'8" guy's elbow at the end of the second period and either suffers a concussion or pre-concussion that will put him on the shelf for the rest of the year, in all likelihood. A month later Malkin tears two knee ligaments and is on the shelf until next year. Tons of other injuries strike, and while they're still among the league leaders in GA, they can't score enough. I suppose they'll still limp into the playoffs, and maybe they'll win a round or two on grit alone. But in all likelihood it's a lost year.
That's in keeping with a historical trend. Through well-timed lottery picks and some canny management, the Penguins are generally able to put together something pretty great to watch on the ice, but something thwarts them from really turning it up to eleven. Take the 1992-93 season, the next-to-last season where players could rack up Sega Genesis scoring totals. Mario's on a pace to shatter Gretzky's 215 season point total, which would have put him in the same conversation with Gretzky in spite of all the games he missed with various injuries, including nearly all of the '90-'91 season. Then cancer intervenes. He recovers from Hodgkins in time to win the scoring title, but the 216-point season is lost. On the team front, the team's coming off back-to-back Cups and after winning 56 games and the President's Trophy, they're a shoo-in to repeat. But the combination of Lemieux's Hodgkins recovery, a freak injury to Kevin Stevens and Glen Healy standing on his head adds up to a Penguin flameout in the second round against an Islanders team that hasn't won another playoff round in the intervening seventeen years.
#9
Posted 24 February 2011 - 01:57 PM
The Blue Jackets would like to believe that their big rival is the Detroit Red Wings. There's a reasonable geographical proximity, and the two teams are in the same division, but I honestly don't think the Red Wings give the Blue Jackets a second thought. And really, they have no reason to think about them twice. A rivalry only works when it's two-sided, and when both teams have a reasonable chance to win.
#10
Posted 24 February 2011 - 02:22 PM
#11
Posted 26 February 2011 - 12:42 AM
Russ, on 24 February 2011 - 12:52 PM, said:
I doubt the Penguins go far this season, but Shero's done a good job the last few days adding some players. Neal's a great young forward and Kovalev for a 7th rounder is basically acquiring a 50-60 point player for nothing.
#12
Posted 27 April 2011 - 02:40 AM
Being humbled and fighting back like this might just do what it takes to get them all the way to the end. I haven't paid any attention to Nashville this season - how do you think these two will stack up?
Edited by N.W. Douglas, 27 April 2011 - 02:42 AM.
#13
Posted 27 April 2011 - 08:48 AM
N.W. Douglas, on 27 April 2011 - 02:40 AM, said:
Being humbled and fighting back like this might just do what it takes to get them all the way to the end. I haven't paid any attention to Nashville this season - how do you think these two will stack up?
I watched it. Very good game, though I think that there's been a lot of good hockey so far this playoffs. As an Oilers fan, I'm not invested enough in the Canucks success to have felt it that intensely, but I did stay up until 1 am EST to see it through and Burrows rewarded. I admire Jonathan Toews and the Blackhawks organization a great deal, but I'm happy to see the Canucks get that monkey off their back and sustain Canada's hopes of seeing the Cup return to our shores.
I think the Canucks will be able to handle Nashville. Anaheim wasn't a strong fourth seed, and the Blackhawks were a better team than their eighth seed would suggest.
Round 2 will be fun, but I'm also excited about the game sevens in the two series remaining in the East.
#14
Posted 27 April 2011 - 01:50 PM
#15
Posted 27 April 2011 - 02:29 PM
Phill Lytle, on 27 April 2011 - 01:50 PM, said:
It's true that depth was the Blackhawks downfall. They gutted the team last summer. Past the top couple lines, there wasn't much there.
#16
Posted 27 April 2011 - 03:21 PM
#17
Posted 28 April 2011 - 03:42 PM
N.W. Douglas, on 27 April 2011 - 02:40 AM, said:
Being humbled and fighting back like this might just do what it takes to get them all the way to the end. I haven't paid any attention to Nashville this season - how do you think these two will stack up?
Agreed, an amazing game from beginning to end. It was nice to be able to be happy at the end of the game, too, unlike the Olympics.
#18
Posted 30 April 2011 - 10:15 PM
I doubt Nashville will be much of a threat. I think the games might lack some of the excitement of the first round because of the lack of storied rivalry between the two teams and the fact that the Predators are strong defensively but lack a potent offence.
#19
Posted 01 May 2011 - 12:05 AM
winter shaker, on 30 April 2011 - 10:15 PM, said:
So much for a lack of excitement. Rinne and Luongo played their hearts out tonight. This might end up being a low scoring series, but I don't think that means it won't be a lot of fun to watch.
#20
Posted 03 May 2011 - 02:20 PM










