Jump to content

StephenM

Member
  • Content Count

    123
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About StephenM

  • Rank
    Member

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://petrifiedfountainofthought.blogspot.com/
  • Twitter
    @greilsarriskirk

Recent Profile Visitors

2,174 profile views
  1. Thanks, Ken. I saw the list at that link, but I had not previously realized that there are intros/short essays on each of the films posted when you click on them. I guess my assumption was that it would be published on the Image website like the various other lists, rather than simply on the forum in discussion-board-site format. Is the partnership with Image no longer happening?
  2. Yeah, when are you guys gonna put up the whole list for the public like you usually do? I've looked over the list on here and on Letterboxd, but I wanna share it. (It's a beautiful video, by the way, terrifically well done.)
  3. Also: 1. The original is still superior on a visual level. 2. Anyone comparing this to Stalker is really, really reaching.
  4. Yeah, I didn't like it. I mean, I wanted to like it, and it was really very impressive in many ways, and there were 2-3 really excellent scenes, and a lot of potentially interesting ideas, but ultimately it just doesn't add up to anything particularly coherent or meaningful. And it takes forever to get there. The original is a slow movie, but that works to its benefit because the mood is so impeccable you can just slip right into it and float. The neon blinking and Vangelis's all-time great score carry you along. This one just dragged every scene out with the assumption that they would be
  5. StephenM

    Stalker (1979)

    Got to see this on a big screen on a restored print a few weeks ago. I'd seen it before, but still: Magnificent. So many details I had forgotten--the dog, the cup moving at the very beginning (while the daughter is asleep), the ringing telephone (so stunning at first, perhaps a theophany, then immediately domesticated--just a wrong number), the Stalker's wall covered in books (his wife's?), the wife's monologue (reconfiguring these men's search for meaning with some hardwon feminine wisdom), and the faint stirrings of Ode to Joy right at the end. In the Zone, Tarkovsky is constantly b
  6. That's a great trailer. It's coming to the Indiana University Cinema near me October 24.
  7. This movie deserved to be a big hit, its a pity it tanked. Guess maybe it was too country and non-sexy to make it with urban audiences, and too critical and mocking of Southern and rural audiences to catch on. Not that it was too mocking--it came from a place of real experience, and real affection for its characters and region, while still having an overall critical appraisal of the ways Southern culture allows itself to be exploited by business and cultural elites. There's so much detail here, and so many points it wants to make! It may be a little much, honestly; it certainly goes on 10-
  8. I really liked this movie. It has a couple awkward structural aspects to the way the narrative unfolds and the way Elizabeth Olsen's character is written, but I don't find those particularly damaging. I just like the way Taylor Sheridan tells stories. Its an old-fashioned vibe you get from classic crime and western novelists, Tony Hillerman or early Elmore Leonard or something, studded with sharp cultural observations throughout. We cpuld use more of this type of filmmaking.
  9. Well, I think that trailer looks amazing. Can't wait.
  10. StephenM

    mother!

    SPOILERS As an aside, the number of reviewers who seem blind to how intensely Biblical virtually every incident in the film is, is rather remarkable. I found the the allegory pretty headsmackingly obvious by the time the man and woman broke the crystal, but I would think everyone should have picked up on by the time Cain and Abel showed up. This review by Michael Koresky notes the Cain and Abel comparison, but only in passing, and seems to regard the early events of the film as realistic and grounded, claiming there's an abrupt turn away from realism in the second half. Did he miss
  11. StephenM

    mother!

    Hmm, I would have thought this thread would be a booming place on here. Have not enough people seen it yet? ___ I did not like the movie. I found it ugly, unpleasant, and grueling to sit through, and I don't think its allegory leads anywhere particularly interesting. But it certainly hasn't left my thoughts much since I saw it Sunday. SPOILERS As to interpretations: The idea of Mother as the devil, is, I agree, rather crazy, and goes against all the signals the film is sending us about who to sympathize with. But there is a way you can see her as a sympathetic rendering o
  12. Who knows when I'll be able to see this, but I am very much looking forward to it. ☺
  13. StephenM

    The Red Turtle

    This movie deserves more viewers. Its clearly the best animation of the year, with every little movement feeling carefully alive, and every cut perfectly timed. Utterly gorgeous on a visual level. I confess I don't think its themes are quite as deep as others do (its ode to the life-cycle is simply that and nothing more as far as I can see), and its metaphors are perhaps a little awkward, but it makes up for it all with beauty.
  14. StephenM

    A Quiet Passion

    This came to my local community-sponsored art movie program last week, and I was all excited to go. But then I got there and realized I had to pay in cash and hadn't brought any with me. I had to park 10 minutes walk away, and I was on the campus of a university closed for the summer and the weekend, so there were no ATMs anywhere nearby. I wandered around for awhile looking, but the movie had already started, and at best I would have missed the whole first act, so I ended up just going home. Guess I'll have to wait for home viewing.
×
×
  • Create New...