Jump to content


Photo

yasujiro ozu (tokyo story, etc.)


  • Please log in to reply
36 replies to this topic

#1 Peter T Chattaway

Peter T Chattaway

    He's fictional, but you can't have everything.

  • Member
  • 29,806 posts

Posted 22 January 2004 - 02:18 PM

Tomorrow, the Pacific Cinematheque starts hosting this retrospective on Ozu, and I'm wondering if anyone here can recommend specific films that must be seen above all others. I'm looking to prioritize, is the thing. Alas, even though Tokyo Story is showing this weekend, I have birthday parties to attend on all three evenings! Curses!

#2 SDG

SDG

    Catholic deflector shield

  • Moderator
  • 9,055 posts

Posted 22 January 2004 - 03:25 PM

Doug C. will certainly weigh in here... I can only say that I've seen two Ozu films, Tokyo Story and Good Morning, and I highly recommend them both.

#3 Christian

Christian

    Member

  • Moderator
  • 10,890 posts

Posted 22 January 2004 - 03:28 PM

I hope to catch at least one of the films in this retropective when it comes to D.C.

I've seen only Floating Weeds from Ozu. It made a big impression at the time, but I can't remember anything about the story. Sumptuous colors, though. Really beautiful.

#4 Peter T Chattaway

Peter T Chattaway

    He's fictional, but you can't have everything.

  • Member
  • 29,806 posts

Posted 24 January 2004 - 04:38 AM

Tonight's birthday party was cancelled, so I got to see Tokyo Story after all. Very interesting, though perhaps unsurprisingly it is not immediately apparent to me what makes THIS one of the five best films of all time (as per that Sight & Sound poll).

I noticed right from the start that the camera stayed low to the ground and many scenes ended with people leaving rooms, and the camera lingering on the emptiness of those rooms. I also noticed that we frequently see people either from behind (why their backs and not their faces?), or frequently in an almost-perfect profile as they look off to the side at something off-screen. As my roommate put it, there is something "claustrophobic" about this film, and it is striking that, while the characters look Out There, we do not; we only look at them as they look.

I also found myself thinking back to the discussion we had on the old board regarding the difference between right-to-left and left-to-right movements and compositions in visual art -- and then I found myself realizing that this film's visuals probably had an entirely opposite effect on me compared to what they were supposed to have, because they were created in a culture where people read right-to-left. Many of the profile shots show people looking to the left ... and how different would these shots have been, for me, if the people depicted in them had been looking to the right instead? Perhaps, in addition to subtitling these films, we should reverse their images as well?

Some wonderful characterizations. The scene where the grandmother takes her grandson out to play, and she watches him and speculates that he might become a doctor but she might not live to see the day, is especially striking -- especially the way the grandson remains completely oblivious to his grandmother, the way each character is shot separately (thus emphasizing their mutual isolation) and the film cuts back and forth between them, and the fact that this is a rare "outdoors" moment in the film. Also, what a strange note to end on, the neighbours smiling and nodding purely out of customary and habitual politeness, even when they are talking to someone about his/her impending loneliness after the death of a spouse; and then that cut to the close-up on the lonely person's face after the customarily polite neighbour goes on her way. Wow. In a culture as emotionally repressed as this, a few subtle gestures speak volumes.

I continue to be amazed by the humour I find in "old" "foreign" "classics". I like how the grandfather tries to dismiss his grandsons' rudeness by saying boys need to be lively, and then all of a sudden some object or other is thrown into the room by one of the boys. I also like how the old couple plans to get up early in the morning for a romantic walk by the beach while staying at the spa, but then they are kept up all night by the partying newlyweds. And yet, given the very different cultural dispositions of 1950s Japan and 21st-century Canada, I wondered how much of this I was SUPPOSED to find funny. Did Ozu WANT us to laugh?

#5 Anders

Anders

    Globe-trotting special agent

  • Member
  • 2,947 posts

Posted 24 January 2004 - 07:57 PM

I noticed right from the start that the camera stayed low to the ground



I read in Ebert's Great Movies column that this was supposed to give the impression of one sitting in traditional Japanese style, on the ground, there by adding to the traditional Japanese feel.

Man, I wish an Ozu retrospective would come to Saskatoon. :cry:

#6 Ron Reed

Ron Reed

    Listmaster Extraordinaire

  • Member
  • 3,261 posts

Posted 25 January 2004 - 02:06 AM

Tonight's birthday party was cancelled, so I got to see Tokyo Story after all.



I was there, didn't see you.

The film didn't have the impact on me that IKIRU did, but I do find myself mulling it, admiring it. Thinking about my life, my parents. A film that leads to contemplation.

What was that line? "Life is disappointing." Sigh.

#7 Peter T Chattaway

Peter T Chattaway

    He's fictional, but you can't have everything.

  • Member
  • 29,806 posts

Posted 25 January 2004 - 02:32 AM

Ron wrote:
: I was there, didn't see you.

"Tonight" in my case meant last night, the 23rd. Seems you saw this film tonight, the 24th.

: The film didn't have the impact on me that IKIRU did, but I do find
: myself mulling it, admiring it.

Same here. I could easily picture going back to it again in a year or two -- I imagine some themes'n'things will especially stand out now that I know how the story ends (quite some foreshadowing there, eh? what with the references to so-and-so's weight, and the scene where so-and-so wonders how much of the grandchildren's lives so-and-so will live to see).

#8 Ron Reed

Ron Reed

    Listmaster Extraordinaire

  • Member
  • 3,261 posts

Posted 25 January 2004 - 03:19 AM

I noticed right from the start that the camera stayed low to the ground



I read in Ebert's Great Movies column that this was supposed to give the impression of one sitting in traditional Japanese style, on the ground, there by adding to the traditional Japanese feel.



I love that book. His opening line on FLOATING WEEDS kept going through my mind as I anticipated seeing my first Ozu tonight: "Sooner or later, everyone who loves movies comes to Ozu." Reading the article again tonight, I am struck by another line: "He is wise about the ways we balance our selfishness with the needs of others." That really strikes me about TOKYO STORY - its wisdom.

Paul Schrader writes (in the Ozu chapter of Transcendental Style In Film):
Ozu's camera is always at the level of a person seated in the traditional fashion on the tatami, about three feet above the ground. "This traditional view is the view in repose, commmanding a very limited field of vision. It is the attitude for watching, for listening, it is the position from which one sees the Noh, from which one partakes of the tea ceremony. It is the aesthetic attitude; it is the passive attitude." (Schrader's quote is from Donald Richie).


#9 Peter T Chattaway

Peter T Chattaway

    He's fictional, but you can't have everything.

  • Member
  • 29,806 posts

Posted 25 January 2004 - 03:34 AM

Paul Schrader and Donald Richie wrote:
: Ozu's camera is always at the level of a person seated in the traditional
: fashion on the tatami, about three feet above the ground. "This
: traditional view is the view in repose, commmanding a very limited field
: of vision. It is the attitude for watching, for listening, it is the position
: from which one sees the Noh, from which one partakes of the tea
: ceremony. It is the aesthetic attitude; it is the passive attitude."

In keeping with my should-we-flip-the-image-around query, here's another thought about the importance of the visual FORM of this film. Would it be significantly different, watching this film on a TV (which, in many cases, is on an even level with the viewer's eye, or possibly even slightly below it), as opposed to watching it in a theatre (where the viewer, at least in the days before stadium-style seating, was always looking up)? Somehow I think it would be.

#10 Peter T Chattaway

Peter T Chattaway

    He's fictional, but you can't have everything.

  • Member
  • 29,806 posts

Posted 26 January 2004 - 01:08 AM

Tokyo Story came out in 1953. The Only Son came out in 1936, and I caught it tonight, and I hate to say I'm already beginning to hope that Ozu isn't a one-trick pony -- yet again, it's a film about a parent who comes to Tokyo to visit her grown child and is disappointed by what she finds, while everyone smiles and smiles and smiles just because that's how you save face when things turn out bad; once again, we see people from behind an awful lot; and once again, there is even a scene in which a woman openly wonders what her grandson will become. Since this is only the second Ozu I've seen, I'll assume for now that the programmers just put these two films together because of their common themes.

SPOILER PARAGRAPH

At any rate, The Only Son, produced when Ozu was 33 (i.e. a few years older than the grown son -- and hey, that's my age!) is a bit more bitter, I think, than Tokyo Story, which he produced when he was 50 (i.e. the age of the disappointed parents), and I guess by then he had become more resigned to the way things are -- still, I wonder what it was that made him address this subject so soon in his younger years. The opening title declares "Life's tragedy begins with the bond(ing) between parent and child..." and the film then begins in 1923, as a teacher persuades a working-class woman to give up her son and send him to a high school far away; the film then jumps ahead to 1936, and the woman visits her 27-year-old son in Tokyo, only to find that he's a mere night-school math teacher, and oh, by the way Ma, I got married and had a son last year. The son spends all his savings trying to impress his mother (he even takes her to a German movie -- an interesting detail, in these years just prior to WW2 -- and proudly proclaims, "This is a talkie!"), but it doesn't work. His mother is let down; all her sacrifices -- and they are more than her son realized -- have been for nothing. And so she goes back to her home and lies to her co-worker that her son has become a "great man", and then she goes outside and sits down with a heavy, heavy heart. Sigh.

This film may have that extra bit of resonance for me right now because my sister recently announced her intention to go to grad school, which prompted my father (who, being British, has always been very class-conscious) to reply that our family was moving up the "food chain" (my great-great-grandfather probably didn't go to school, my great-grandfather probably went to primary school, my grandfather quit school at 14, my father got a B.A., now my sister is pursuing an M.A.). My father has always been disappointed that I never pursued grad studies and became a professor myself -- he resented my getting into journalism and film criticism for quite some time, only changing his tune when articles of mine began to appear in evangelical magazines that he liked -- but since he's always been a hard-to-please sort, I think I've tried to learn to write off his dissatisfaction as just one of his peculiarities. These films, though, are beginning to make this theme seem a lot more universal and inevitable. I bet if I saw one of these films right after, oh, Thirteen, I would never ever want to have children of my own.

Hmmm. Hadn't meant to get into all that. Anyway, The Only Son was preceded by a ten-minute short called I Graduated But..., which is actually a montage of all the footage that remains from a silent feature film that Ozu made in 1929. (There was no music to go with the film, so watching it was a little odd -- every cough, every rattle of a popcorn bag, every person shifting in his or her seat was louder than usual here.) Hacked down to ten minutes, I Graduated But... is like a rather moralistic fable -- swallow your pride, oh over-educated and under-employed, and good things will come to you! Ironically, the film came out just before the Great Depression kicked off, after which it became REALLY difficult to get a job, and apparently the film's title became a popular catchprase in Japan. Oh, one other detail I rather liked was the Harold Lloyd movie poster the protagonist has in his apartment.

#11 Ron Reed

Ron Reed

    Listmaster Extraordinaire

  • Member
  • 3,261 posts

Posted 26 January 2004 - 01:52 PM

Tokyo Story came out in 1953. The Only Son came out in 1936, and I caught it tonight, and I hate to say I'm already beginning to hope that Ozu isn't a one-trick pony --



This comes as a surprise after reading Schrader's book? It seems clear that Ozu wasn't after variety.
Page 18: Ozu's career was one of refinement: he constantly limited his technique, subject matter, and editorial comment....

Page 19: "In every film," Richie writes, "the whole world exists in one family..."

Page 20: Ozu's later cycle of family-office films (thirteen films from 1949 to 1962) features the estrangement of parents and children...."

Page 21: Ozu was notorious for filming the same situation over and over again...

Page 22: One must not, however, mistake Ozu's "predictability" for suprficiality or obviousness. It is not necessarily a virtue - or necessarily a fault - if a director uses the same techniques repeatedly in film after film. Predictability in Ozu's films does not stem from a lack of initiative or originality, as it does in the films of some directors, but rather from the primitive concept of ritual in which repetition is preferred to variety.


#12 Russell Lucas (unregistered)

Russell Lucas (unregistered)
  • Guests

Posted 27 January 2004 - 12:14 PM

If being a "one-trick pony" means having a distinctive and unique style capable of communicating complex subtleties of human interaction over the course of a large group of films, then saddle me up!

#13 Peter T Chattaway

Peter T Chattaway

    He's fictional, but you can't have everything.

  • Member
  • 29,806 posts

Posted 27 January 2004 - 02:32 PM

Heh, no, I was thinking more of the fact that he seemed to be telling the same STORY over and over again.

And speaking of repeated story elements, last night I caught I Was Born But... (1932) and Good Morning (1959), and although these two films were made almost three decades apart, they both involve two bratty boys who 'go on strike' (a hunger strike in 1932, a vow of silence in 1959) because of their dissatisfaction with their parents.

I'm pretty sure I saw I Was Born But... in film class way back when, and I remember finding it tough to watch because there was no sound at all in the print that we saw -- not even a music track. Well, same here -- the version they screened last night was as silent as they get. But I got more involved in the story this time, and I was especially puzzled and intrigued by the game the kids played throughout the film, of making a person fall to the ground by pointing a finger at him, and then crossing themselves and holding out their hands to 'raise' the kid in question. One thing I am constantly noting in Ozu's films is the influence of western culture (Harold Lloyd posters, German films, English lessons, etc.), and here we see what appears to be a 'magic' trick borrowed from Christianity. Of course, we once again see parents wondering what will become of their children, and at one point the boys' mother says to one of them, "I'd worry if you didn't make something of yourself." I was also struck by the fact that here we have yet another Ozu film in which people watch films -- though in this case they are watching the boys' father's boss's home movies.

And speaking of western influences, the music in Good Morning is pretty darn symphonic and jazzy, and I think I spotted a Levi's red tag on the back of one kid's jeans. Plus -- oh glorious day -- the film is in colour! And what a beautiful colour print, too. (There are moments in Tokyo Story where Ozu is clearly trying to capture a beautiful image of nature or some such thing, and I kept thinking what a shame it was that the film existed only in scratchy black-and-white prints. If only he had had colour like THIS!) This film is basically all about housewives and children and the quest for domestic appliances like television sets and washing machines, and at times it made me think of Douglas Sirk, but without the melodramatic romance. It is also all about farting, and for the life of me, I can't remember if I have ever before seen people fart -- at all, never mind as frequently as this -- in a movie made before, oh, Blazing Saddles. I must say, all this talk of "transcendence" hadn't exactly prepared me for the flatulence. Alas, I was very tired last night, so I think I nodded off for about 5-10 minutes somewhere in the last half-hour, but I would gladly see this film again. (And thanks for your capsule review, SDG!)

#14 Russell Lucas (unregistered)

Russell Lucas (unregistered)
  • Guests

Posted 27 January 2004 - 07:54 PM

QUOTE
Heh, no, I was thinking more of the fact that he seemed to be telling the same STORY over and over again.


I hear you. I just think that's a criticism too often made by the uninitiated about one of my favorites-- Eric Rohmer-- and one of yours-- Woody Allen. We like that one movie they keep making!

#15 Peter T Chattaway

Peter T Chattaway

    He's fictional, but you can't have everything.

  • Member
  • 29,806 posts

Posted 27 January 2004 - 09:43 PM

Heh, I was actually thinking of Eric Rohmer as I wrote that, actually. But I will concede you make a fine point about Woody Allen. smile.gif

BTW, SDG, I just noticed in your journal that you saw Tokyo Story just three days before I started this thread -- if it's still fresh on your mind, do you have any comments to make on that film, or on any of the comments that have been made on that film here?

#16 Peter T Chattaway

Peter T Chattaway

    He's fictional, but you can't have everything.

  • Member
  • 29,806 posts

Posted 28 February 2004 - 04:02 AM

Whoa, has it really been a month since the last time I caught one of these films? Yikes. Anyway, the series has another three weeks to go, and now that I've hopefully got all the Passion hubbub out of my system, I'd like to catch a few more. Any recommendations?

#17 Christian

Christian

    Member

  • Moderator
  • 10,890 posts

Posted 19 March 2004 - 11:33 AM

I don't see any mention in this thread -- maybe it's elsewhere -- but Wim Wenders made a documentary about Ozu, and it's screening March 28 at the Goethe Institute in D.C. Here's the institute's summary of Tokyo-Ga:

This third of Wim Wenders' film diaries traces the footsteps of the great Japanese director Yazujiro Ozu, the only filmmaker from whom Wenders once claimed he learned anything. In the film, Wenders wanders through Tokyo twenty years after Ozu's death, comparing life there now with what he knows of the city from Ozu's films. The differences are striking, yet Wenders manages to reflect on them and look for moments of truth amidst the noisy pachinko halls, neon lights, and other trappings that have all but obscured the transparent world that Ozu's films captured.

#18 Doug C

Doug C

    Member

  • Member
  • 1,564 posts

Posted 19 March 2004 - 11:45 AM

Tokyo-Ga is a compelling little essay film, well worth seeing. It's part travelogue (Wenders actually randomly bumps into Herzog at a Tokyo tourist site) and part homage to Ozu and his culture and abiding themes. Did you see Wenders' comments on the Criterion Tokyo Story release?

#19 Christian

Christian

    Member

  • Moderator
  • 10,890 posts

Posted 19 March 2004 - 12:36 PM

QUOTE
Did you see Wenders' comments on the Criterion Tokyo Story release?


I have not, but a friend of mine invited me -- twice -- to catch "Tokyo Story" on the big screen at AFI last Sunday. I couldn't make it. I've been pressing for his reaction since, but so far, nothing.

#20 Christian

Christian

    Member

  • Moderator
  • 10,890 posts

Posted 26 March 2004 - 06:40 AM

Just a quick note to say that a search of my library system's online catalog for Ozu videos turned up zip on the movie front, but it did pull up a book -- "The Best American Movie Writing 1999," edited by Peter Bogdanovich -- that includes a Phillip Lopate Cineaste essay on Ozu, "The Subtly Observant Eye." It's a good primer on Ozu's films, if anyone's interested.
The same volume has plenty of other excellent film writing from Andrew Sarris, Martin Scorcese, Jonathan Rosenbaum and David Denby, among others.