Jump to content


Comments from the 2005 Top100 Survey Round ONE


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
21 replies to this topic

#21 DanBuck

DanBuck

    Bigger. Badder. Balder.

  • Member
  • 2,419 posts

Posted 15 August 2005 - 08:11 AM

I suppose we want to steer clear of the Oscar debacles of snubbing somebody one year for somebody who is long overdue, etc, etc.

#22 Peter T Chattaway

Peter T Chattaway

    He's fictional, but you can't have everything.

  • Member
  • 30,183 posts

Posted 15 August 2005 - 11:03 AM

Alan Thomas wrote:
: IE, ignore the director/language/year/etc. Look at each film separately.

Oh, I dunno, I'll probably be paying some attention to year, just as some people will be paying attention to whether it's an "obscure" movie or not. The fact that so many nominees came out in just the last decade indicates a certain short-sightedness that it is the duty of lists like this to correct.